Profile
Settings
Refer your friends
Sign out
Critical thinking is the ability to think clearly and rationally while also comprehending the logical relationship between ideas. In essence, critical thinking necessitates candidates’ ability to deduce the explanation for everything.
Being an active learner rather than a passive receiver of information is central to critical thinking. Instead of accepting ideas and assumptions as they are, a smart critical thinker will question them. They are always looking to see if the ideas, arguments, and findings represent the whole picture of any particular assertion.
Please note that the terms “critical reasoning,” “critical thinking,” and “clear thinking” are used interchangeably throughout this article. In other words, critical reasoning comprises critical thinking or clear thinking.
Three fundamental components of thinking, we believe, are involved in critical reasoning.
The components are as follows:
The ability to think critically is known as critical reasoning.
Critical reasoning is informed reasoning.
Critical thinking includes self-reflection.
Critical reasoning includes argument development, analysis, and evaluation. As a result, understanding what we mean by “discussion” is crucial. The term “argument” has three different meanings:
A fight or dispute between two or more persons.
An argument between two or more persons who disagree, in which each participant defends his or her point of view.
Critical Reasoning Types
Let’s take a look at the different types of questions that could appear in the Critical Reasoning section one by one.
The Statement and the Argument
A sequence of statements is made in this sort of critical reasoning, each presenting a different point of view and expressing diverse ideas for or against something. Candidates must select the proper argument from a list of options.
Assumption and Statement
Candidates must make the correct decision based on the presented statements in this sort of critical reasoning. Choosing the proper assumption is the right decision in this case.
Conclusion and statement
A paragraph or statement will be offered, followed by some conclusions in this sort of critical thinking. Candidates must make decisions based on these statements and choose the proper conclusion from among the options presented.
Statement and Action Plan
A circumstance will be offered as a statement in this sort of critical reasoning, and some possible courses of action will be given in the context of that situation. Candidates will be asked to choose which of them, depending on the supplied remark or occurrence, should be followed.
Cause and Effect
Candidates must assess if the statements supplied are independent causes or effects of independent causes, or whether they are merely a shared cause, in this sort of critical reasoning.
How to Answer Critical Reasoning Questions
Step 1: Make the phrasing of the question as simple as possible. We all know that the shortest, most straightforward response is frequently the best. The phrases will be framed in the most perplexing way feasible by the examiners. It will make the test makers’ jobs easier if candidates can simplify the terminology they employ.
Step 2: Try to utilise as many of your own words as possible. The simplest method to convey something is to use your own words. To make the chapter easier to understand, take short notes and summarise the supplied question.
Step 3: Fully comprehend the question. To do well in the critical thinking part, practise mock tests as much as possible to become familiar with all of the topics and their question patterns.
Questions
1)Should the government have stepped in to assist victims of triple Divorce?
Argument: No, since they are capable of dealing with their condition.
Solution: This reasoning is flawed since they are all dependent on others, which is not an ideal scenario for anyone.
2)Statements: Foreign imports should be prohibited.
Argument: Of course. Importing books from other countries is pointless.
Solution: These arguments avoid getting to the heart of the matter. As a result, these types of arguments are weak.
3)Is privatising all of India’s schools the best way to achieve a literacy rate of 100 percent?
Argument: No, poor people will be unable to finance schooling.
Solution: The argument is that if all schools are privatised, education will become unaffordable for the poor. Illiteracy is a major issue among the poorer parts of society. Education will become more expensive as a result of privatisation. As a result, it will not assist in achieving a 100% literacy rate, but rather will work against it. As a result, this argument is convincing.
4)Statement: You should have your child examined by a professional doctor, in my opinion.
Assumption: Specialist doctors are better at diagnosing than general practitioners.
Answer: The assumption is correct. One person suggests that his child should be examined by a professional. He is obviously assuming that specialist doctors diagnose better than general practitioners.
5)Statement: It rained the night before last. The ground had to have gotten damp.
Assumption: The ground becomes wet when it rains.
Solution: When items come into contact with water, they get wet. As a result, when it rains, the ground becomes soaked. As a result, this is an acceptable assumption.
Conclusion
Critical thinking can help you gain a better understanding of yourself, allowing you to avoid any negative or restricting views and instead focus on your abilities.
The ability to express yourself can improve your quality of life.
Critical thinking abilities are beneficial in all aspects of an organisation.
These qualities help with communication, creativity, and problem-solving. In the business, critical thinking allows you to connect ideas, analyse arguments, identify flaws, and solve complicated problems.
