How Growing Global Population

Road congestion, pollution, fossil fuel consumption, and deforestation are only a few of the human-caused repercussions on the physical environment. Climate change, land erosion, poor air quality, and water shortages have all been induced by such changes. These negative consequences can influence human behaviour and lead to mass migrations or water wars.

The effects on ecosystems and biodiversity are significant as a result of such significant habitat degradation. According to the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), there are approximately 2,000 species. Habitat loss affects mammals all across the world. 85 percent of the species on the Union’s Red List face a primary danger. Species whose existence is threatened, endangered, or threatened with extinction critically threatened.

“Population Growth and Increasing Resource Consumption“

The planet’s population has more than increased in the twentieth century, and continuing expansion, particularly in developing countries, is expected over the next 50 years. People consume or destroy around 40% of the plant growth and productivity of terrestrial and marine plants, indicating that humanity’s population is growing . The Earth’s regenerative resources are rapidly depleting at this rate, and the likely doubling of the worldwide population over the next 50 years would exacerbate these pressures. Increased population and resource consumption have two effects on biodiversity: they put pressure on wildlife habitat to be converted to agricultural and urban land, and they produce trash that pollutes habitat and poisons species. Population stabilisation, more effective resource use, recycling, and pollution management can all help to counteract these tendencies.

“Ignorance About Species and Ecosystems“

We may lose a species because we were unaware it existed in a developed environment. A species may be well-known locally, but if traditional methods of life change, this knowledge may fade. Hundreds of tribes and other tribes in India use biodiversity goods on a daily basis.

About 5,000 species of native plants are known to be used by tribal people in India for a variety of reasons, including food, fibre, antidotes for insect and snake bites, medicines, and the manufacture of hunting, fishing, and farming tools.

Knowledge about the world’s biological forms falls behind other branches of scientific investigation by a remarkable amount. While individual species of birds, fish, animals, and plants are well-studied, only around 1.4 million of the world’s 5-30 million species have been named. The rationale is that our understanding of ecosystem structure and function is similarly limited. Information on the state and worth of biological resources, as well as the uses and management practises used by traditional cultures over the centuries, is also scarce.

“Poorly Conceived Policies“

Government policies that promote certain industries, such as agriculture or forestry, can have the unintended consequence of diminishing biodiversity. Policies that provide rights to settlers who “improve” or “clean” the land, for example, can lead to the extinction of biodiversity. Modern land laws are incompatible with the few existing population property systems, such as the Cree of Canada’s, in which hunting and collecting are strictly restricted for the long-term benefit of the community . The loss of biodiversity could also be caused by a lack of collaboration between government departments with conflicting duties. For example, an environmental agency might be tasked with sustainable forestry while the agriculture department tries to promote crop exports by subsidising land clearing. A government might start a scheme to connect protected areas.

The loss of biodiversity could also be caused by a lack of collaboration between government departments with conflicting duties. For example, an environmental agency might be tasked with preventing deforestation while the agriculture ministry strives to promote crop exports by supporting farmers who clear land. A government may start a programme to connect protected areas with rural development, but fail to set aside funds to sustain the programme once the initial project funding runs out.

Conclusion 

This comprehensive study looked at the interactions between population increase and environmental change during the last half-century, with an emphasis on emerging countries. Many sorts of environmental pressures are exacerbated by population growth. The significance of the growing population is a primary force pushing the basic necessities of the population. Food production is based on a natural resource basis. This puts water under stress in the environment. Agriculture’s impact on trees, soil, and air However, as a study conducted in the 1990s found. According to a thorough scientific investigation, population growth isn’t the sole factor influencing resource consumption rates, says the report. It’s degrading, and in many circumstances, it’s certainly not the most important factor. Increased food production is hampered by a slew of obstacles. and improved resource management. Weak land tenure arrangements, insufficient financing availability, skewed agricultural prices, and so on are among them. Exchange rates, unfavorable tax regimes, inadequate agricultural extension services, and overbearing government are all factors. Civil conflicts, and control However, few, if any, of these issues will be fixed quickly. Population increases are the circumstances in which this expansion will be imposed.