Sumant Kumar is teaching live on Unacademy Plus
unacademy 23 June 2018 The Hindu Daily News & Editorial Analysis The Hindu(Completely) Indian Express(Very Imp pieces) Delivered by : Sumant Kumar * B.Tech in Computer Science & Engg, NIT Allahabad * Have written UPSC Main Exam in 2016 and 2017 with Physics Optional
Sumant Kumar Follow VERIFIED An NIT Allahabad Graduate. Computer Sci&Engg. Have written UPSC Mains 2 times with Physics. Follow me for TheHindu News/Edit+ CA Analysis 40,774 Views in last 30 days N 109,422 Lifetime Views UpVote, Rate, Review. Share 8 Courses 3.9k Followers Following PDFs, Notes, Materials? Facebook ID: AdSumant Telegram Ch: AdSumant By Sumant Kumar By Sumant Kumar (Hindi) Mock Test 1 for UPSC Prelims 2018/2019 (Hindi) April 2018: The Hindu Daily News & Editorial Analysis... unacademy:com/user AdSumant 147 ratings 38 reviews 72 tatings 21 reviews
[IE Ed] A Trump Card The Narendra Modi government has taken the right step in hiking tariffs on 29 products imported from the US To begin with, its action is purely retaliatory, to counter the US' unilateral imposition of duties amounting to 25 per cent and 10 per cent on certain steel and aluminium items imported from all countries, barring Brazil, Argentina and Australia. * Secondly, India kept the World Trade Organisation (WTO) fully informed before announcing the increased duties. o The additional revenue from these, it told the multilateral body that regulates international trade, was equivalent to what the US government would collect from its tariffs on steel and aluminium products imported from India Thirdly, India has a stake in ensuring a rule-based multilateral trading system under the WTO o In joining the European Union and China, which have also taken similar tit-for-tat tariff measures against the US, it has done just what is necessary to protect this open trading system operating on the principle of comparative advantage. o This is as opposed to "impairment to national security" the justification that the Donald Trump administration has given for its unilateral trade actions.
The higher duties that India has imposed- especially on dry fruit and apples- will certainly hurt the US In 2017-18 alone, the country imported $668.22 million worth of almonds, $107.18 million of fresh apples and $38.01 million of walnuts from the US These are not the most essential food items and can, moreover, be sourced from other origins as well almonds from Australia or apples from China and Chile Nor will the increase in tariffs on chana (chickpea) and masur (lentil) lead to runaway food inflation when India is anyway today surplus in pulses Besides, the US is an insignificant supplier of these pulses compared to Australia and Canada Simply put, Californian and Washington state farmers stand to lose far more from the current trade standoff than any perceived gains to steel and aluminium makers in Pennsylvania or Ohio Even bigger losers are American consumers and workers in industries-from cars, washing machines and refrigerators to highways and skyscraper building that need steel and aluminium The government has, at the same time, been sensible in leaving the door sufficiently open for negotiations. Its retaliatory tariffs are to come into effect only from August 4 Also, there is one product motorcycles with engine capacity of over 800 cc on which India had contemplated raising duties, as per the list that was submitted to the WTO. That item, which basically targets the iconic Harley-Davidson bikes, has been deliberately excluded at the last moment. It can very well serve as a "trump card" when the assistant US trade representative, Mark Linscott, visits India next week for holding talks with Indian officials. And India, on its part, should assuage genuine US concerns over intellectual property rights protection and price controls on medical devices.
[IE Ed2] Message from the top The war of words between West Bengal CM and state BJP chief is unedifying. Worse, it can fuel cadre violence. [IE Ed3] Cry for Argentina There hasn't been a lower point for the country with a proud footballing tradition. International Chemical Weapons Convention The Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) is a multilateral treaty that bans chemical weapons and requires their destruction within a specified period of time CWC is an arms control treaty which outlaws the production, stockpiling, and use of chemical weapons and their precursors and entered into force in 1997 cwc negotiations started in 1980 in the UN Conference on Disarmament. o The convention opened for signature on January 13, 1993, o and entered into force on April 29, 1997.
The CWC is implemented by the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), which is headquartered in The Hague. O The OPCW receives states-parties' declarations detailing chemical weapons-related activities or materials and relevant industrial activities. After receiving declarations, the OPCW inspects and monitors states-parties' facilities and activities that are relevant to the convention, to ensure compliance. The CWC is open to all nations O Israel has signed but has yet to ratify the convention. A key non-signatory includes North Korea. O Most recently, Angola deposited its instrument of accession to the CWC on 16 September 2015 As of October 2016, about 93% of the world's declared stockpile of chemical weapons had been destroyed Developing, producing, acquiring, stockpiling, or retaining chemical weapons. Chemical weapons use or military preparation for use. The Chemical Weapons Convention prohibits The direct or indirect transfer of chemical weapons. Assisting, encouraging, or inducing other states to engage in CWC-prohibited activity. O The use of riot control agents "as a method of warfare."
[IndianExpress Article] Redraw The Red Line The Chemical Weapons Convention O Chemical weapons asphyxiate, choke, blister and poison. Even when not lethal, their effects can last a lifetime. During the 20th century, they were used on and off the battlefield with horrific consequence During the First World War, more than 90,000 soldiers suffered painful deaths following the use of chlorine, mustard and other chemical agents. Almost a million more were blinded, disfigured or received debilitating injuries. Chemical weapons (CW) were also used with devastating consequences in Morocco, Yemen, China and Abyssinia (now Ethiopia). The aftermath of their deployment in the 1980s Iran-Irag War continues to be felt today, with 30,000 Iranians still suffering and dying from the effects of the agents used in the conflict. When the Chemical Weapons Convention came into force, it brought the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) into existence. For the first time, the world had an independent,non-political body to investigate chemical weapons use O One hundred and ninety-two countries, including India, have now ratified the Convention and are States O The international community has agreed that the development, production, stockpiling and deployment O There can be no impunity for anyone who uses chemical weapons Parties to the Chemical Weapons Convention. of these instruments of death should be confined to the past.
Just over 20 years on from this watershed moment, and five years after the OPCW was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize for its extraordinary achievements, this agreement and these norms are under threat. Since the start of 2017 alone, chemical weapons have been used against civilians in Syria, Iraq (again), Malaysia and the UK The repeated use of chemical weapons represents a grave threat to the Chemical Weapons Convention and the rules-based international order that keeps us all safe. It must now be protected and strengthened. Answering the call of the UK and other states, the OPCW announced that the signatories of the Chemical Weapons Convention will come together on June 26 and 27. OWe are calling on states around the world, including India, to join together to find ways to strengthen and protect this cornerstone of the international non-proliferation and disarmament regime.
[TheHindu Article1] Wages of vigilantism The recurring incidents of lynching and targeted mob violence against vulnerable groups reported from various parts of the country are a direct challenge thrown by right-winggroups to political processes, especially electoral processes and the rule of law parts of the conry are a direct challe byriht wing roups to According to India Spend, a data-journalism website, 86% of those killed in lynching incidents in 2017 were Muslims. OIn September 2017 the Supreme Court, responding to a Public Interest Litigation, directed all State governments to take measures to prevent vigilantism in the name of cow protection. However, public lynching or vigilante violence hasn't subsided; in fact, it has spread from Uttar Pradesh, Jharkhand and Haryana to Gujarat, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh and West Bengal. An overwhelming majority of these attacks are bovine related, although there are other reasons for anti-minority attacks, too. Hate violence has also happened around festivals such as Ram Navami (Bihar and West Bengal), provocations over azaan and namaz (Gurugram in Haryana) and violence against those looking overtly Muslim (U.P. and Haryana trains) The victims in cases of lynching are almost entirely from poor families.
Minorities under siege South Asia has a long history of communal violence, but these were primarily big episodes of mass violence. OThis has now given way to a smaller-scale of conflict and vigilante violence against individuals endorsed by state inaction OOne possible reason for this shift could be an attempt to avoid public scrutiny that accompanies mass violence, whilst at the same time ensuring that minorities are continually kept under siege through targeted attacks India has a poor record when it comes to prevention and punishment of the perpetrators of mass violence and/or lynchings. Each event of violence has hardened community boundaries and widened the divide between Hindus and Muslims.
What explains the phenomenon and spread of lynchings across several States? OApart from the political reasons alluded to above, the rising trend is directly related to the intensification of communal polarisation and instrumentalisation of prejudice for political ends apparent in various government attempts to infuse religion into politics and education. In the event, these acts seem to have acquired a certain degree of legitimacy in the public mind. O Also, it's important to acknowledge the widespread role of violence in Indian politics which is not considered an illegitimate form of politics. Popular anger, outrage and violence are integral features of everyday politics in contemporary India O The feeling that mobs are exacting Bollywood style justice beyond the procedures of law, with crowds of locals triumphantly watching the gruesome spectacle captured by videos that subsequently go viral, has its own vicarious fascination. As hate crimes grow, so does the sense of impunity enjoyed by the actual perpetrators of the crime and those who prompt it. O Lack of justice for victims further reinforces the vicious cycle of impunity. There is also little condemnation of lynchings by those in positions of authority except in very generalised terms. The strategic silence of the BJP-Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) leadership works like unspoken approval to carry out the attacks O The lack of public reaction to recent incidents implies a degree of acceptability of violence as arn expression of vengeance against 'injustices' suffered by Hindus in the past.
Sustained propaganda Lynchings are encouraged by the atmosphere of hate and suspicion created through sustained propaganda D Always ready to refurbish the deep historical archive of anti-Muslim prejudice by focusing on the past to demonise all Muslims, the BJP has weaponised Hindu anger and paranoia into a legitimate expression of a majoritarian nation. Localised violence happening with regularity also serves a political purpose. O By allowing lynchings to continue unchecked, the Hindu right boosts its image as the lone protector of Hindu religion and culture in India and this can help expand its social base Cow vigilantism, which is a pretext to exacerbate social conflicts between religious communities, serves the political purposes of ideologies and political formations that thrive on hate and polarisation OPreventing further atrocities requires respect for the rule of law and legal institutions and strong prosecutions and expeditious punishments. Unless checked, it can cause irreversible harm to the social fabric of our society and to the tenets of democracy that have shaped and sustained the idea of India. [TheHindu Article] An adviser with nobody to advise Arvind Subramanian has had quite a paradoxical tenure as the CEA to the Finance Minister.