Sign up now
to enroll in courses, follow best educators, interact with the community and track your progress.
Download
Lesson-23
61 plays

More
In this lesson we discuss about the sociology of knowledge.

Shalini mishra is teaching live on Unacademy Plus

Shalini mishra
A passionate teacher, NET qualified, UGC NET Qualified. 9 years of teaching experience. Love to give my knowledge to all students in need.

U
Unacademy user
Sir, Q1) Can a member who has been expelled from a party join another party without attracting schedule 10?? Q2) Can a member vote freely if no whip is issued, even if it goes against the stand of his party?? Would be really great ful if you could answer these two questions.
  1. ABOUT MY SELF NAME Star Educater) : SHALINI MISHRA (Unacademy . QUALIFICATION : UGC NET QUALIFIED OCCUPATION : ASST. PROFESOR


  2. Thinkerl Karl Mannheim


  3. Important Books e Ideeology and Utopia e Essays on Sociology of Knowledge o Man and society in an age of reconstruction


  4. Sociology of Knowledge o a direction of theoretical and empirical research that investigates the social nature of knowledge; the socioh istoricalconditionality of knowledge, knowledge acqui sition, and consciousness; and the social aspects of the production,dissemination, and use of various types of knowledge by society as a whole and by specific classes social groups, andorganizations.


  5. e classics of Marxism Leninism have treated the main issues in the sociology of knowle dge: the theory of the socialessence and conditionality of conscio usness, the historical nature of knowledge acquisition, and the methodology forstudying these topics. Marxism Leninism has established the existence of multidimensional vari eties of consciousness,characterized by the presence of various f orms and levels and the degree to which they adequately reflect r eality; it has alsodiscovered the general laws of development and the class roots of ideology, The Marxist- Leninist interpretation of the socialnature of knowledge and kno wledge acquisition contrasts with both a naturalistic interpretati on and vulgar sociologism


  6. Bourgeois sociology of knowledge emerged in the 1920's as a relat ively independent research field through the efforts of M.Scheler and K. Mannheim in Germany and P. Sorokin, F. Znaniecki, T. P arsons, R. Merton, A. Child, C. W. Mills, W. Stark, P.Berger, and T. Luckmann in the USA. Bourgeois sociology of knowledge, whi ch exhibits a great variety of theoretical andmethodological appr oaches, has borrowed from Marxism the concept of the social co nditionality of consciousness. TheMarxist notion is interpreted, however, e ther in a distinctly idealist manner or in the spirit of a narrowly defined determinism(technological, organizational, lin guistic). Bourgeois sociologists ignore the role of sociohistorical Dractice in the formation ofconsciousness and usually exclude kn owledge in the natural sciences from the sphere of social determi nation. Bourgeoissociology of knowledge is to a great extent dire cted against Marxism-Leninism


  7. o In its investigation of the history of thought, types of world view and cultures, and ideas and their originators and exp onents,bourgeois sociology of knowledge views social facto rs mainly as distorting the process of cognition; these facto rs includesocial status, class position, ideology, and values This is related to the tendency, which predominated until t he late 196o's, tosee science and ideology as opposed to eac h other and to "purify" knowledge from value judgments; t his was reflected in theconcepts of "deideologization" andt he "end of ideology" An opposite tendency that has gained considerable influence sincethe late 1960's, particularly in t he USA, stresses the relativism of scientific knowledge and the ideological nature of


  8. science.The empirical investigation of states of consciousness (p ublic sentiments and opinions) among various classes and social occupational, and other groups emphasizes the functional natur e of the interrelations between the individual's consciousnessand his immediate surroundings, Bourgeois sociologists of knowledg e are of various political and ideological orientations andrange fr om open apologists to proponents of bourgeois- democratic ideas. Bourgeois sociology of knowledge as a whole is characterized by a chronic crisis in its philosophic and methodol ogical principles, which is reflected in the constantreplacement of these principles and in sharp internal controversies. On the ot her hand, the empirical findings of bourgeoissociology merit att ention, as do its techniques and procedures for collecting materi al


  9. Marxist sociology of knowledge studies the methodological problems of the sociological approach to consciousness an d thecognitive process, the sociohistorical nature of the acq uisition of knowledge, and the way class and society condit:i on theobjective reflection of reality and its distorted, illuso ry forms "false consciousness." It also critically examines the various concepts of bourgeois sociology of knowledge. In addition, it studies the mechanisms of cognitive activity and theappe arance and functioning of various types of knowledge, sent iments, opinions, and convictions among social groups and collectives. 03


  10. In Ideoloqy and Utopia, he argued that the application of the term ideology ought to be broadened, He traced the history of the term from what he called a "Darticular" view. This view saw ideologv as the perhaps deliberate obscuring of facts, This view gave way to a total" conception (most notably in argued that a whole social group's thought was formed by its social position (e.g. the proletariat's beliefs were conditioned by their relationship to the means of production). However, he called for a further step, which he called a general total conception of ideology, in which it was recognized that everyone's beliefs-including the social scientist's-were a Marx), whiclh roduct of the context they were created in. Thus, to Mannheim ideas were products of their times and of the social statuses of their proponents."


  11. annheim points out social class, location and generation as the greatest determinants of knowledge.4l He feared this could lead to proposed the idea of maintained that the recognition of different perspectives according to differences in time and social location appears arbitrary only to an abstract and disembodied theory of knowledge. relativisnm but elationis as an antidote. To uphold the distinction, he .The list of reviewers of the German Ideology and Utopia includes a remarkable roll call of individuals who became famous in exile, after the rise of Hitler: Hannah Arendt, Max Horkhei G nther Stern (aka r, Herbert Marcuse, Paul Tillich, Hans G nther Anders), Waldemar Gurian, Siegfried eurath ugust Wittfogel , B la Fogarasi, and In the early 1970s, Erich Fromm and Michae ac would later illustrate scientifically the effects of social class and economic structure on personality in their landmark study Social Character in a Mexican Village


  12. Clifford Geertz


  13. e Max Weber and his interpretative social science are strongly present in Geertz's work. Geertz himself argues for a "semiotic" concept of culture: "Believing, with Max Weber, that man is an animal suspended in webs of significance he himself has spun," he states, "I take culture to be those webs, and the analysis of it to be therefore not an experimental science in search of law but an interpretative one in search of meaning. It is explication I am after, construing social expression on their surface enigmatical


  14. Geertz argues that to interpret a culture's web of symbols, scholars must first isolate its elements, specifying the internal relationships among those elements and characterize the whole system in some general way according to the core symbols around which it is organized, the underlying structures of which it is a surface expression, or the ideological principles upon which it is based. It was his view that culture is public, because "meaning is," and systems of meanings are what produce culture, because thev are the collective property of a particular people. We cannot discover the culture's import or understand its systems of meaning, when, as Wittgenstein noted, "we cannot find our feet with them."Geertz wants society to appreciate that social actions are larger than themselves; they speak to larger issues, and vice versa, because "they are made to


  15. In seeking to converse with subjects in foreign cultures and gain access to their conceptual world, this is the goal of the semiotic approach to culture. Cultural theory is not its own master; at the end of the day we must appreciate, that the generality "thick description" contrives to achieve, grows out of the delicacy of its distinctions, not the sweep of its abstraction. The essential task of theory-building here is not to codify abstract regularities, but to make thick description possible; not to generalize across cases, but to generalize within them


  16. o His often-cited essay" Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese " is the classic example of thick description, a Cockfight concept adopted from the British philosopher Thick description is an anthropological method of explaining with as much detail as possible the reason behind human actions, Many human actions can mean many different things, and Geertz insisted that the anthropologist needs to be aware of this. The work proved influential amongst historians, many of whom tried to use these ideas about the 'meaning of cultural practice in the study of customs and traditions of the past. Gilbert Ryle


  17. During Geertz's long career he worked through a variety of theoretical phases and schools of thought. In his essay "Ethos, Worldview and the Analysis of Sacred Symbols," published in his 1973 book The Interpretation of Cultures, Geertz wrote that "The drive to make sense out of experience, to give it form and order, is evidently as real and pressing as the more familiar biological needs...", a statement that reflects an early leaning toward