EDITORIALS THE HINDU DAILY IMPORTANT EDITORIALS 13/AUG/2018 PRESENTED BY ISHAN (EDUCATOR ON UNACADEMY)
PLEASE RATE, REVIEW SHARE & RECOMMEND FOLLOW ME ON UNACADEMY https:llunacademy.com/user/thakurishan00-2762Search a Ishan Kumar O Ishan kumar Ishanee Akshda im trom UPave done my graduation om
Undoing a legacy of injustice
Undoinga legacy of injustice The Delhiligh Court order striking down the Begging Act heeds the Constitution's transformative nature pozi ajunantid 2.Undoing a legacy of injustice Topic- GS Prelims,GSM2 ontext- The Delhi High Court eorder striking down the Begging Act heeds the Constitution's neah m t ctaransformative nature. PIC CREDIT-THE HINDU Page-8
2.UNDOING A LEGACY OF INJUSTICE 01n 1871, the colonial regime passed the notorious Criminal Tribes Act. This law was based upon the racist British belief that in India there were entire groups and communities that were criminal by birth, nature, and occupation. . The Act unleashed a reign of terror, with its systems of surveillance, police reporting, the separation of families, detention camps, and forced labour. More then six decades after independent India repealed the Act, the "denotified tribes" continue to suffer from stigma and systemic advantage.
INSTANCE OF DEHUMANISATION The Act was one strand of a web of colonial laws that dehumanised communities and ways of life. . The colonial administrators were particularly concerned about nomadic and itinerant communities, which by virtue of their movements and lifestyle were difficult to track, surveil, control, and tax. Through laws such as the Criminal Tribes Act, and other legal weapons such as vagrancy laws, the regime attempted to destroy these patterns of life, by using criminal laws to coerce communities into settlements and subjecting them to forced labour. Independence brought with it many changes, but also much continuity. Despite the birth of a Constitution that promised liberty, equality, fraternity, and dignity to all, independent India's rulers continued to replicate colonial logic in framing laws for the new republic.
They continued to treat individuals as subjects to be controlled and administered, rather than rights bearing citizens. One of the most glaring examples of this is the Bombay Prevention of Begging Act. ' The Begging Act was passed in 1959 by the State of Bombay, and has continued to exist in as many as 20 States and two Union Territories. But last week, in a remarkable, landmark and long overdue judgment, the Delhi High Court struck it down as inconsistent with the Constitution.
THE MINUTIAE... What does the Begging Act do? It criminalises begging. It gives the police the power to arrest individuals without a warrant. It gives magistrates the power to commit them to a "certified institution( read: a detention centre) for up to three years on the commission of the first "offence" and up to 10 years upon the second "offence Before that, it strips them of their privacy and dignity by compelling them to allow themselves to be fingerprinted. The Act also authorises the detention of people "dependant" upon the "beggar" (read: family), and the separation of children over the age of five. Certified institutions have absolute power over detainees, including the power of punishment,and the power to exact"manual work" Disobeying the rules of the institution can land an individual in jail.
. From its first word to the last, the Begging Act reflects a vicious logic. . First, there is the definition of "begging"The Act defines it to include "soliciting or receiving alms, in a public place whether or not under any pretence such as singing, dancing, fortune telling, performing or offering any article for sale" and "having no visible means of subsistence and wandering about or remaining in any public place in such condition or manner, as makes it likely that the person doing so exist soliciting or receiving alms." Not only do these vague definitions give unchecked power to the police to harass citizens but they also reveal the prejudices underlying the law. The pointed reference to "singing, dancing, fortune telling, performing or offering any article for sale" makes it clear that the purpose of the Act is not simply to criminalise the act of begging (as commonly understood), but to target groups and communities whose itinerant patterns of life do not fit within mainstream stereotypes of the sedentary, law abiding citizen with a settled job.
And the reference to "no visible means of subsistence and wandering about'" punishes people for the crime of looking poor_but it also reflects the lawmakers' desire to erase from public spaces people who look or act differently, and whose presence is perceived to be a bother and a nuisance. The Begging Act encodes into law the vicious prejudice that recently saw a prominent institution putting up spikes outside its Mumbai branch, to deter rough sleeping (they were removed after public outrage). . Once individuals fall within its clutches, the Begging Act effectively renders them invisible, by confining them to "certified institutions" after a truncated, summary judicial procedure. Like the poor houses of 19th century Europe, it is based on a philosophy of first criminalising poverty,and then making it invisible by physically removing "offenders" from public spaces. Effectively it places a cordon sanitaire around the poor and the "undesirable", keeping them from accessing spaces reserved for the use of "respectable" citizens.
I m from U.P. I have done my graduation from university of delhi in B.sc (H) Physics.. Aspirant of UPSC CSE..