UPSC » UPSC CSE Study Materials » General Awareness » A Key Notes on Arthashastra: Kautilya

A Key Notes on Arthashastra: Kautilya

In this article We all know about Arthashastra: Kautilya like what is Arthashastra: Kautilya, author and date of writing author shipImportance of Arthashastra kautilya.

The Arthashastra refers to a practise of political diplomacy that emerged in India, and is epitomised by the written material on position, policy and military strategy written by Kautilya. Kautilya was a professor at Taxila University and later the Mauryan Empire’s Prime Minister. Because of his unquestionable and astute strategies and policies, which match a “realist” approach to politics, diplomacy, and warfare, he is known as the Indian Machiavelli. His Arthashastra treatise advised that no measures were beyond a ruler’s grasp to expand his territory or gain power, as well as the unethical ethics of allowing torture, fraud, deception, and spying as valid tactics to gain territory, wealth, and power.

Arthashastra: Kautilya

The preceptor Kautilya and his masterwork the Arthashastra are both often misunderstood. He is commonly referred to as Chanakya and is frequently mocked as an unethical, if not outright immoral, teacher as a proponent of the belief that “the ends justify the means,”

‘Chanakyan’ has become the equivalent in Indian terminology.

of the word ‘Machiavellian’ The majority of people have no idea who Kautilya is.

According to the Arthashastra. The only memory they have is of the

The Mandala’ hypothesis is founded on the following principles: ‘Every neighbouring state is equal.’is an adversary, and the adversary’s adversary is a friend.’

This widespread viewpoint is not only simplistic but also incorrect.

The diversity and depth of ancient Indian history are well known in Arthashastra.

It is a groundbreaking treatise on statecraft in all of its elements, written at least 1500 years ago. Unfortunately, Kautilya’s grandeur remains underappreciated due to a lack of a modern translation. The major goal of this translation is to make it as accurate as possible, avoid complicated constructions and keep everything as simple and modern as feasible archaisms, making it easily understandable by educated laypeople.

 The reasons for this are explored in further depth in the Introduction.The verse order in the original text is not strictly kept in this translation.There has been some rearranging and regrouping by theme.

made. An extensive introduction and description of the Kautilyan state are included.In order to satisfy scholars and the general public, society has become necessary.equip others with the appropriate context.

Read about Tips for UPSC Preparation

Author and date of writing

The authorship and date of writing are uncertain, and there is evidence that the surviving manuscripts are not original and have been altered over time, but they were most likely produced in the best form possible during the 2nd and 3rd centuries CE. The surviving manuscripts of the Arthashastra, according to Olivelle, are the result of at least three major overlapping divisions or layers, each with 15 books and 150 chapters, and 180 subjects. The first chapter of the first book is an archaic table of contents, while the last chapter of the last book is a short 73 poem epilogue declaring that the work was created using all thirty two Yukti (components of sound reasoning techniques).

While all chapters are primarily prose, each transitions into a poetic verse as a marker near the end, a style that can be found in many ancient Hindu Sanskrit texts, where the changing poetic metre or style of writing is used as a syntax code to silently signal that the chapter or section is ending. Each of the text’s 150 chapters concludes with a colophon that lists the title of the book in which it belongs, the themes covered in that book (similar to an index), the total number of titles in the book, and the books in the text.

Finally, when a new chapter or book begins, the Arthashastra text numbers all 180 themes consecutively, rather than starting from one. 

Authorship

Some stylistic discrepancies within the surviving manuscripts indicate that it was likely written by multiple authors over the centuries. “Revisions, faults, additions, and possibly even subtractions have occurred” in Arthashastra since its final redaction in 300 CE or before, according to Olivelle. Various historical sources use three names for the text’s author:

Check out the UPSC Notes

Kauṭilya or Kauṭalya 

The name “Kauá¹­ilya ” or its variant “Kauá¹­alya” is used in the text to identify the author; both spellings appear in manuscripts, annotations, and references in other ancient works; it is unclear which is the author’s original spelling.

This individual was most likely the author of the original recension of Arthashastra: the Arthashastra’s introductory verse declares that its author consulted the so-called “Artha Shastras” to construct a new treatise, implying that the recension was based on prior works.

Vishnugupta

After recognising “many faults perpetrated by commentators on treatises,” a verse at the end of the text identifies its author as “Vishnugupta” (Viugupta), asserting that Vishnugupta himself produced both the text and its commentary. Vishnugupta was the author’s personal name, according to R. P. Kangle, while Chanakya (Cakya) was the name of his gotra. Others, such as Thomas Burrow and Patrick Olivelle, point out that the name “Vishnugupta” does not appear in any of Chanakya’s earliest texts. According to these researchers, “Vishnugupta” could have been the pen name of an author whose gotra name was “Kautilya”; nevertheless, this person was not Chanakya. According to historian K C Ojha, Vishnugupta was the editor of the text’s ultimate recension.

Also see UPSC question paper 2020

Chanakya

The Arthashastra’s concluding passage claims that the treatise was written by the individual who saved the kingdom from the Nanda kings, yet it does not name this person.

Chanakya, the Maurya prime minister, was instrumental in overthrowing the Nanda dynasty. Chanakya is linked to Kautilya or Vishnugupta in several later texts: Mudrarakshasa is the only source in which all three names – Kauilya, Vishnugupta, and Chanakya – are used to refer to the same person. Other early sources use the names Chanakya (Panchatantra), Vishnugupta (Kamandaka’s Nitisara), both Chanakya and Vishnugupta (Dandin’s Dashakumaracharita), or Kautilya (Bana’s Kadambari).

Conclusion

The ancient Indian compilation of political wisdom, theory, and statecraft, Kautilya’s Arthashastra, provides insight. It contains timeless principles and is one of the most important political and strategic treatises ever written. The value and relevance of such techniques and concepts in today’s environment could be beneficial. Some of the ideas could be useful in achieving long-term gains and resolving some of the major difficulties confronting many countries today. The Kautilya’s Arthashastra gives advice to a wise king on how to advance the state’s national interests, which are centred on issues of security, riches, and reputation.

faq

Frequently asked questions

Get answers to the most common queries related to the UPSC Examination Preparation.

According to Kautilya, what is Arthashastra?

Arthashastra by Kautilya. Kautilya’s written material on position, policy, and military strategy is an example...Read full

What is the significance of Kautilya's Arthashastra?

The Arthashastra was discovered to contain a collection of rules for ruling a huge empire, including internal admini...Read full

What was Arthashastra's main theme?

The Arthashastra summarises the political beliefs of Chandragupta Maurya’s chief minister Kautilya, or the bas...Read full

Who found the Arthashastra of Kautilya?

The original Arthashastra was discovered in 1905 by Rudrapatna Shamashastri , a Sanskrit scholar and librarian, amon...Read full

What was the overall strategy of Kautilya?

War, according to Kautilya, is an expression of a state’s foreign policy. He advises a king on how to use aspe...Read full