National Institute Ranking Framework (NIRF)

The National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) is a mechanism used by India’s Ministry of Education to rate higher education institutions in the country. On September 29, 2015, the MHRD approved the Framework and the Minister of Human Resource Development announced it. 

Effectiveness Of The Core Teaching/Learning In Institution

1. Integrate Common Core and teacher effectiveness teams’ planning and operations within the SEA.

• It should be the state chief’s obligation to promote the necessity of combining these policy strands both within and outside. After that, the chief should evaluate the SEA’s readiness to assume this critical leadership role. This evaluation should disclose whether the agency’s present structure can handle this activity or if structural adjustments are required first.
• Regardless of whether a structural change is required, the state superintendent should assemble a planning and management committee inside the SEA of leaders and key support employees involved in the Common Core and teacher effectiveness policy implementation.

2. Acquire and develop internal knowledge quickly to guarantee that the Common Core is applied correctly and consistently.

• State agencies play a critical role in ensuring the quality and consistency with which the Common Core and teacher effectiveness initiatives are implemented. Only by drawing on and deploying professionals in these two major policy and practice areas will SEAs be able to lead and manage this agenda. 

The Common Core is likely to be misinterpreted and toned down without this knowledge, and teacher evaluation procedures are likely to be misaligned as a result.

3. Make sure that professional development activities are consistent with Common Core requirements.

• Professional development for teachers and principals should be viewed as a chance to combine Common Core requirements and initiatives to improve teacher effectiveness. The appearance and reality that these are different and distinct programmes is perpetuated by designing and providing professional development solely from one.

4. Establish and promote professional networks of school district officials, principals, and teachers in order to speed professional development and improve knowledge of the Common Core and teacher evaluations.

• State education departments are unable to offer classroom teachers job-embedded, context-specific professional development.

SEAs, on the other hand, are ideally positioned to assist districts and charter school organisations in sharing information and expertise.

Different types of institutions depending on their areas of operation

Institutions were categorised into 11 separate groups based on their fields of operation: overall, university, colleges, engineering, management, pharmacy, legal, medical, architecture, dentistry, and research.

For ranking purposes, the Framework considers a number of factors, including resources, research, and stakeholder perception. 

These parameters were organised into five groups, each of which was given a different weighting. The weightings differ according to the kind of institution. In the first round of rankings, around 3500 schools freely participated.

On April 3, 2017, the Ministry of Human Resources and Development (MHRD) announced the 2017 ranking lists. 

Formation

On August 21, 2014, the Ministry of Human Resource Development (MHRD) held a one-day workshop on improving approaches for rating higher education institutions in India. 

The group decided to form a committee to develop a national ranking framework. Later, it was agreed to include representatives from central institutions and IIMs in the proposed committee as well. 

On the 29th of October 2014, a core committee of 16 members was formed based on these decisions, with a secretary (HE, MHRD) as chairperson & additional secretary (TE), MHRD, as member-secretary. 

The vice-chancellors of Delhi University, EFL University, Central University of Gujarat, and JNU, as well as the directors of IIT Kharagpur, IIT Madras, IIM Ahmedabad, IIM Bangalore, NIT Tiruchirappalli, NIT Warangal, IIIT&M Gwalior, NAAC, and the NBA chairperson, were among the other participants.

10% weightage is given to Outreach

Different Parameters Have Different Weights:

Teaching & Learning, Methodologies & Research, and Professional Practice each receive 30% of the weighting for university rankings, while Graduation Outcome receives 20%. Outreach, Inclusivity, and Perception each receive 10% of the vote.

Institutions were ranked using the following methodology

Every institution is given a score based on five factors:

1. Instruction, Learning, and Resources

This characteristic is linked to the core operations of any educational institution.

For instance, the faculty-to-student ratio, the number of professors having a Ph.D., and so on.

2. Professional Practice and Research

It comprises the number of articles submitted by academics and students to international journals, patents, and intellectual property rights, among other things.

3. Graduation Results

This characteristic serves as the ultimate litmus test for the success of the institution’s core teaching/learning. It covers information such as the number of placements, average salaries for students placed, and students who choose to pursue further education.

4. Inclusion and outreach

The Ranking system places a specific emphasis on women’s presence in institutions, students from other states, students with physical disabilities, and so forth.

5. Observation

The rating system places a high value on how students, the general public, and alumni see the school.

Conclusion:

India’s Ministry of Education uses the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) to assess higher education institutions in the country. The Framework was approved by the MHRD on September 29, 2015, and the Minister of Human Resource Development announced it. The Honourable Minister of Human Resource Development introduced the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) on September 29, 2015, and the MHRD approved it. This framework outlines a method for rating colleges and universities across the United States.