Sealed Cover Jurisprudence

Jurisprudence is the understanding and clearing of the ideas of law that mostly relate to the law and its theoretical study. On the other hand, the sealed cover is considered a private or confidential piece of information that is only accessible with the permission of the chief justice of the country. The fundamental concept of “About Sealed Cover Jurisprudence” is based upon the practice undertaken by the Supreme Court to mitigate the acceptance of the appeal to allow the sealed cover opining. There are different incidents based “About Sealed Cover Jurisprudence” and its functions as the “Previous Instances of Sealed Cover Jurisprudence by SC”. 

About Sealed Cover Jurisprudence

The operation or practice that is undertaken by the higher authority of India, the Supreme Court pivots on maintaining the confidentiality of information. In order, to perform the learning of the seal information lower court of the other governmental body of India can appeal to know the law or rule of jurisprudence. The entire processing of the sealed cover jurisprudence is governed under the act of the chief justice of India. 

The derivation of this power comes from the “Rule 7 of Order XIII”, which is under article 123in the India evidence cat of 1872. Under this act, no one can have the access to the seal cover. However, it is an act of contradiction in itself as the one part of the constitution states the right to know the other is restricted to the use of it. 

Previous Instances of Sealed Cover Jurisprudence by SC 

In the “Previous Instances of Sealed Cover Jurisprudence by SC” this background of the people is devoid of the rights and functionality of serving justice to the people. These acts took place with one of the SC who was residing in some areas of Kerala, named Gopalakrishnan V. There was an inclusion of the seal covered jurisprudence that had a proof to justify making Gopalakrishnan V.  The non-guilty, however, the government of India’s Supreme Court did not allow the relevance of the document and injustice was served to the SC man. This caused an immense issue among the people of India and it began the agitation and criticism of such law and rule of the Indian government. Even it was denied of the abduction and fair scope of the trail for the SC, Gopalakrishnan V. 

Criticism on Sealed Cover Jurisprudence

In every aspect of the political background, there is the inclusion of different laws and rules. However, it is not every very rule of law that has the most desired outcome from the law or rule. Similarly, situation with this law or rule by the supreme court of India has been noticed. There are various incidents that are the subject of “Criticism on Sealed Cover Jurisprudence” like the case of the principle of open court, right to know or information. It further includes the “principles of the natural justice”, and SC judgment. 

There is a violation of the law of natural principal law where the member of political parties is deprived of full appreciation for any factor in the study of the case. The functionality of the “Sealed Cover Jurisprudence” is purely against the constitutional law and basic human rights of India, where the citizens have the right to know and learn about the facts and their direct impact on the lives of people.

Conclusion 

“Sealed Cover Jurisprudence” is the main piece of content in regard to the political backdrop where the practice of this law or rule is made in order to allocate a sense of privacy for an incident. However, if there is any piece of evidence required for proving the innocence of a certain group of people, then an appeal is required to be made to the supreme court of India. Moreover, the purpose of the “Sealed Cover Jurisprudence” must be the maintenance of privacy but it must be justified and not at the cost of justified doubts.