Profile
Settings
Refer your friends
Sign out
Understanding the difference between the Regulating act and Pitt’s India act is necessary for identifying each unique attribute and component. Deficiencies within the regulating act can be understood by considering this analysis. Supervision of the British government was to be analysed by impactful consideration of affairs related to the British East India Company. The Regulating act of the year 1773 was an important part of the Indian governmental system as this was the first step of the British government for regulating business and internal affairs of India.
Facts related to the regulating act of 1773
- Territories of India, especially within Bengal are intended to be controlled by the British government by implementing the regulating act and Pitt’s India act
- In June 1773 this regulating act was passed
- Officials of British governments are found to be associated with corruption. Nepotism was to be reduced by implementing this act
- The complexity of the dual administration procedure, introduced by Robert Clive was an important reason behind considering this new act
- The regulating act of 1773 was passed to increase lawfulness within Bengal
- As per the Regulating act and Pitt’s India Act, the governing council of Bombay and Madras had been included within the Bengal controlling system
- According to this act, the governor-general was left with no power to use the veto
- An important disadvantage of this regulating act is its inefficiency in reducing corruption
- Concerns regarding the Indian local population were not mentioned and introduced within his act which affected the overall successful implementation process of this act
Facts related to the Pitt’s India act
- Pitt’s India Act is also known as the EIC Act (East India Company act) of 1784
- This act was considered by the British parliament for addressing every single shortcoming of 1773’s Regulating Act
- The rule of East India Company was fully established within India by this act
- The Regulating act and Pitt’s India act were introduced in India to establish a double and beneficial governmental system
- The British East India Company and Great Britain were considered to be at the crown of the British government
- Pitt’s India act was introduced by William Pitt the younger, the then British prime minister
- Day-to-day administration procedure was to be managed efficiently by considering this act by British governmental bodies
- Commercial considerations and activities of the government were also to be managed by the Pitt’s India act
Important differences between regulating act 1773 and Pitts India act
|
Regulating act 1773 |
Pitt’s India act |
|---|---|
|
This act was mainly introduced for ensuring a strong control over Indian territory. |
Pitt’s India Act was introduced to overcome the defects of the regulating act. |
|
This act was introduced to save the East India Company from a financial crisis. |
This act was introduced to control and manage governmental bodies within Indian Places and to maintain a successful rule. |
|
An important provision of this act is the five-year selection procedure of company directors. |
Administration procedure of the Indian region is to be developed by implementing this act. |
|
All correspondences of revenue are to be associated with this act. |
Efficacy in controlling Indian territories and judicial factors are to be increased by implementing this act. |
|
A supreme court was established in Calcutta, the then capital of India with the first Chief justice, Sir Elijah Impey. |
As per this act, all responsible activities and activities of the East India company are to be managed. |
Comparison between regulating act and Pitt’s India act
Comparison of Regulating act 1773 and Pitts India act is important for presenting significant parts with which impacts of the British ruling system on India can be understood. According to a comparison of the Regulating act 1773 and Pitts India act, this later act is found to be more applicable and impactful than the regulating act of 1773. The Indian judicial and administration process had developed by introducing Pitt’s India Act. For the first time, East India Company’s territories within India were regarded as ‘British possession in India’ in Pitt’s India Act.
Conclusion
The British East India Company was defeated by Hyder Ali of Mysore in 1769. This also encouraged the British government to introduce a new act that can help the British government ensure a strong control over Indian Territory. Main provisions of the Pitt’s India Act can be identified by analysing the difference between the Regulating act and Pitt’s India act. As per this act, a board of control was established for maintaining revenue, civil and military affairs, and considerations.
