UPSC » UPSC CSE Study Materials » Economy » Purchasing power parity

Purchasing power parity

Purchasing Power Parity: Versions of Purchasing Power Parity, Significance, Issues, etc.

Purchasing Power Parity

  • The Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) principle argues that currency fluctuations are in balance when their buying power is equal in both nations
  • This implies that the currency value should be equivalent to the ratio of the two nations’ prices for a given basket of consumer goods
  • The “law of one price” serves as the foundation for PPP. In the elimination of shipping and other transaction expenses, when prices are represented in the same currencies, competing marketplaces will equalise the price of an item listed in two nations

Purchasing Power Parity:

  • Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) is described as the number of units of a country’s currency necessary to purchase the same number of products on the domestic economy as one dollar would purchase in the United States
  • The Purchase power parity approach enables us to determine the amount of exchange required between two currencies to accurately depict the buying power of the currency pairs in their respective nations
  • For illustration, a cell phone that costs roughly 3000 rupees in India would cost around USD 40 in the United States if the currency rate is 75 rupees to one
  • The formula for purchasing power parity is as follows:

S equals P1 / P2.

Where S denotes the rate of exchange of one currency to another

             P1 = price of a product in currency 1

             P2 = price of the same product in currency 2

  • It is a widely used macroeconomic indicator for comparing the currencies of various nations using a “basket of products” method
  • It enables analysts to compare productive capacity and life quality across nations

Versions of PPP:

  • Analysts use two different definitions of PPP: Absolute PPP and Relative PPP
  • Absolute PPP theory refers to the leveling of prices between nations, while relative PPP refers to the rates at which prices vary, i.e., rate of inflation
  • This argument asserts that the rate of exchange rates is equivalent to the difference between the overseas and native nation’s price inflation

Significance of Purchasing Power Parity:

  • Buying Ability Governing parties are necessary for turning economic growth indicators into similar units across countries
  • It is computed using the prices of a shared basket of products in each member economy and serves as a proxy for the purchasing power of one economy’s domestic currency in another economy
  • Commodity currency exchange adjustments take into account both price movements and variations in expenditures, making them unsuitable for volume assessments
  • PPP-based spending translations reduce the influence of price level variations across countries and represent only volume disparities

International Comparison Programme

  • The International Comparison Program is one of the world’s biggest statistics efforts
  • The International Comparison Program is a density estimation endeavor that collects relative pricing data and estimates the world’s countries’ purchasing power parities
  • The World Bank administers the International Comparison Program on behalf of the United States Commission
  • Worldwide, 176 countries took part in the 2017 International Comparison Program cycle. The very next ICP assessment will be in 2021
  • The International Comparison Program’s primary aims are:
  • To generate purchasing power parities (PPPs) and similar Price Level Indices (PLIs) for member countries. A Price Level Indices is a normalised average (usually a weighted average) of price relationships for a certain class of products or demand for a particular location over a specified time. Price Level Indices is a statistic that enables comparisons of how these costs are related, considered together, and vary throughout timeframes or geographical areas. Price Level Indices offer a variety of possible applications. For very wide indices, the index may be considered to reflect the overall price range or standard of rent in the sector. More precise Price Level Indices may aid manufacturers in developing business planning and pricing strategies. Occasionally, they might be beneficial in assisting in the direction of investing
  • To transform quantity and per capita measurements of Gross Domestic Product (GDP) and its spending components to a single currency using PPPs
  • Gross domestic product (GDP) is a commonly used indicator of profitability, generated by a country’s productive capacity over a certain period. Additionally, Gross domestic product quantifies the revenue generated by such production or the total amount spent on finished products and services. Gross domestic product (GDP) is the single most significant metric of economic activity
  • Important Highlights:

  • India is also the world’s third-biggest economic health of PPP-based share of global Average Personal Expenditure and Net Wealth Creation
  • Gross fixed capital formation (GFCF) determines the economy that is included in a country’s official statistics, such as those maintained by the UN System
  • The most significant exception from Gross fixed capital formation is the trade and acquisition of real estate
  • The total dividends are denoted by Gross fixed capital formation. It is calculated as the sum of a producer’s purchases, minus the value of fixed assets disposed of during the income statement, plus specific adjustments to the value of quasi assets
  • The segment accounted for 6.7 per cent, or USD 8,051 billion, of the world’s largest total GDP of USD 119,547 billion in PPP terms, in contrast to China’s 16.4 per cent and the US’s 16.3 per cent
  • In the emerging economies, India maintained its second-largest economic growth in 2017, contributing 20.83 percent of Gross Domestic Product in Purchasing power parity (PPP)
  • China ranked top with 50.76 per cent, followed by Indonesia with 7.49 per cent
  • Additionally, India is the world’s second-biggest economy in terms of PPP-based proportion of region Actual Personal Expenditure and Gross Asset Creation

Important Points:

  • The PPP exchange rate’s value is highly reliant on the basket of products selected. By and large, commodities are picked that substantially adhere to the rule of one price. As a result, ones are readily exchanged and are widely accessible in both places. Organizations that calculate PPP exchange rates use a range of different bundles of items and hence arrive at a variety of different values
  • The PPP exchange rate may differ from the market rate. The current price is more variable than the exchange rate because it is affected by variations in demand at individual locations. Additionally, tariffs and wage differentials might lead to longer-term discrepancies between both strike prices. PPP may be used to forecast relatively long currency values
  • Since PPP currency values are more predictable and less influenced by barriers, they are often used for comparable countries, such as comparing nations’ Gross domestic product (GDP) or even other government revenue figures. These figures are often labelled PPP-adjusted

Issues with Purchasing Power Parity:

  • Calculating purchasing power parity is exacerbated by the fact that all nations do not have the same market price
  • Transport Costs: When goods are not accessible locally, they must be imported, incurring transportation costs. These expenditures include not just the cost of gasoline, but also import tariffs. As a result, imported items will sell at a higher price than equivalent domestically generated commodities
  • Tax Differences: Official tax rates, such as the value-added tax (VAT), may cause pricing differentials across countries
  • Government Intervention: Tariffs may significantly increase the cost of foreign goods, even when the identical items are available at a lower price in those other nations.
  • Market Competition: In certain countries, goods may be purposefully priced higher. In certain circumstances, higher prices are justified by a business’s chance to compete over other vendors. The corporation may have dominance or be a member of a cartel of enterprises that unfairly inflate prices