Key Highlights:
- The Dispute: China has filed a complaint at the WTO against India’s Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes for the automobile and Advanced Chemistry Cell (ACC) battery sectors.
- India’s PLI Scheme: The schemes offer financial incentives based on incremental sales to domestic industries, aiming to boost manufacturing and attract global EV producers.
- Core of China’s Complaint: China alleges that the three PLI schemes violate WTO law because they condition financial benefits on meeting a Domestic Value Addition (DVA) requirement (e.g., 50% for ACC batteries).
- WTO Violation: The DVA requirement is considered a prohibited subsidy under WTO rules, specifically:
- SCM Agreement: It qualifies as an Import Substitution (IS) subsidy, which is a subsidy contingent upon the use of domestic goods over imported goods.
- TRIMS Agreement: It is also a prohibited trade-related investment measure because it imposes local content requirements.
- Legal Provisions: WTO law strictly prohibits subsidies contingent on export performance (Export Subsidies) or the use of domestic over imported goods (Import Substitution Subsidies).
Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) Scheme – Automobiles & Auto Components:
Launch Year: 2021
Budget: ₹25,938 crore
Focus: Promote advanced automotive technologies (AAT) such as electric vehicles (EVs), hydrogen-powered vehicles, and high-tech auto components.
Key Objectives:
Increase domestic manufacturing value addition
Boost India’s EV ecosystem and export competitiveness
Reduce dependency on imported components
Target Beneficiaries: OEMs, auto component manufacturers adopting futuristic technologies
Tenure: 5 years
Why in the News?
- China’s complaint initiates a formal trade dispute against India’s flagship manufacturing incentive program (PLI schemes).Â

