Profile
Settings
Refer your friends
Sign out
Why in News:
- The Supreme Court has recommended seizing and auctioning the assets of acid attack convicts to compensate victims, emphasizing deterrence over reform.
About the Supreme Court’s Observations and Directives
- Asset Seizure Recommendation: The Court suggested that assets of those guilty of acid attacks be seized and auctioned in a transparent manner to compensate victims, serving as both punishment and deterrence.
- Rejection of Reformative Approach: Chief Justice Surya Kant stated that a “reformative approach has no place for acid attackers” and called for extraordinary punitive measures beyond the standard letter of the law.
- Police Investigation: Police are directed to investigate the assets of the accused and submit details with the chargesheet; courts should then order an embargo on creating third-party rights on these assets.
- Comparison to Dowry Death: The Court suggested the crime be treated with severity comparable to “dowry death,” potentially shifting the burden of proof (onus) onto the accused through legislative intervention.
- Legislative Changes: The Centre was asked to consider carving out exceptions in the general sentencing policy for acid attacks to ensure punishment acts as a stronger deterrent.
- Data Collection: States are directed to furnish yearly data on acid attacks, including chargesheets filed, case status, victim details (employment, medical treatment), and state rehabilitation expenses.
