Disinvestment often refers to the sale of a government-managed firm, either partially or entirely, by the government. Typically, a firm or government organization would disinvest as a calculated decision in an asset for the company in order to raise resources to address general/specific requirements.
Disinvestment
The new economic policy, which went into effect in July 1991, plainly showed that Public Sector Units or Public Sector Undertakings had a considerably unfavorable rate of return on capital invested. Unproductive PSUs were and continue to be a drain on the government’s resources, transforming them into liabilities and not assets. Many projects that had previously been constructed as pillars of growth have become a drag on the current standards. Low returns from PSUs were also having a negative impact on the national GDP and gross national savings. Due to poor savings from the sector of PSUs, around 10 to 15% of total gross domestic savings was getting lowered. Profit levels were excessively low in comparison to the capital used.
Objectives of Disinvestment
- To minimize the government’s financial burden
- Improving Public options related to Finances
- Competition and regulation of the market must be introduced.
- To finance expansion
- Encourage a greater percentage of ownership
- Services that are non-essential should be made non-political.
Importance of Disinvestment
The significance of disinvestment rests in the use of funds for:
- Funding the expanding fiscal deficit;
- Financing large-scale infrastructure development; and
- Increasing consumption through better investments in the economy.
- To repay public debt levels/interest- Nearly 40-45 percent of the Center’s earnings are used to service public debt levels/interest.
- To fund community programs such as healthcare education and infrastructure.
Disinvestment is particularly important because of the existence of a more competitive market, which is harder for most of the PSUs to run financially. This causes the value of public assets to rapidly erode, making it important to disinvest in advance in order to obtain a better value.
Disinvestment in India
Disinvestment in India is a policy of the Government of India in which the Government partially or completely liquidates its holdings in Public Sector Enterprises. The decision to disinvest was made primarily to lessen the budgetary burden and bridge the government’s income gap. Public Sector Enterprises were the driving force behind India’s post-independence boom (PSE). The social and developmental commitments of the nation were most essential among the PSE’s post-independence tasks, which led to these entities avoiding competitive racing.
In the Budget forecasts for 2021-22, Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman set a goal of Rs 1.75 lakh crore for disinvestment, which has been cut to Rs 78,000 crore. She has also set a lesser goal of Rs 65,000 crore for the fiscal year 2022-23.
Types of Disinvestments
Disinvestments are usually approached in three ways.
Disinvestment by Minorities
Minority disinvestment occurs when the government retains a majority ownership stake in the corporation at the end, frequently greater than 51 percent, ensuring management control.
Disinvestment by the majority
Majority disinvestment occurs when the government retains a minority share in a company after selling a majority holding.
Total Privatization
Complete privatization is a sort of majority disinvestment in which the whole ownership of the firm is sold to a buyer. ITDC’s 18 hotel properties and HCI’s three hotel properties are two examples.
Conclusion
We learned about Disinvestment, disinvestment in India & other related topics related to disinvestment.
Disinvestment is the process of converting financial obligations or securities into currency or cash.” Disinvestment is also described as an organization’s (or government’s) activity of disposing of or liquidating an asset or subsidiary. It is also known as ‘divestment’ or ‘divestiture.’
Disinvestment in India is a government policy of India in which the Government partially or completely decides to sell its holdings in Public Sector Enterprises. The choice to disinvest was made primarily to lessen the budgetary strain and cover the government’s income gap.