Profile
Settings
Refer your friends
Sign out
In May 2015, the Index of Industrial Production (IIP), used to measure industrial growth in India, registered a decrease of 2.7 per cent, putting a dent in the government’s promises of a return to high growth. The overall development of the secondary sector in April was also reduced to 3.4 per cent from 4.1 per cent previously projected.
The manufacturing sector’s poor growth, from 4.2 per cent in April 2015 to 2.2 per cent in May 2015, contributed to the slowdown in industrial growth. The mining and energy industries improved by 2.8 per cent and 6%, respectively, while the consumer goods industry declined by 1.6 per cent.
Consumer durables and nondurables both had -3.9 per cent and -0.1 per cent declines, respectively. Capital goods were also a drag on industrial growth, growing at a meagre 1.8 per cent in May 2015, compared to 6.8% in April 2015.
Despite improvements in essential industries like energy and mining, slower capital goods growth indicates that business attitudes are still not strong enough to inspire enterprises to add machinery to their production lines to raise output.
Reasons for the Slowdown
In May 2015, the negative growth of consumer goods was a major drag on industrial growth. Due to poor demand from rural areas, consumer goods demand decreased in May 2015. Unseasonal rains during the harvesting season in April resulted in significant losses of rabi crops in general and wheat in particular, lowering farmers’ revenue. Loss of income resulted in lower demand from rural regions, impacting consumer goods growth.
Slow growth in capital goods and manufacturing revealed that the investment climate is still not conducive to strong growth, implying that urgent reforms are required. Despite the government’s efforts to lower the administrative burdens of doing business in India, the country scores poorly in this regard. Slow growth implies that the investment climate still has a lot of room for improvement. Reduced demand, infrastructure constraints, and numerous obsolete rules all obstruct strong development. Why would a foreign company invest in India when it is so simple to conduct business in low-cost nations like Bangladesh and Vietnam? Although a cyclical increase in demand might boost GDP, it is rarely long-term sustainable.
The factors affecting Industrialisation in developing countries
Unfortunate Capital Formation: One of the major factors contributing to India’s slow modern development is the unfavourable pace of capital formation.
Political Factors: During the pre-autonomy period, the British rulers’ modern arrangement was not beneficial to the country’s interests. As a result, India remained an important country for the British during their 200-year rule, which hampered its modernisation in its early years.
Absence of Infrastructural Facilities: India’s infrastructural offices are still in reverse, which impedes the country’s industrialisation. As a result, modern development could not be achieved without legal transportation (rail and street) and post offices in many rural areas, even though those areas had enormous development potential.
Terrible showing of the Agricultural Sector: Modern advancement in India depends on the exhibition of the horticultural area. Along these lines, the lacklustre showing of the rural area coming about because of common elements is another significant element answerable for the current stagnation in the country. Agribusiness gives not just unrefined substances, and staples hovel additionally creates interest for the products delivered by the modern area. Consequently, this horrible showing of farming retards the improvement of businesses in India.
Holes among Targets and Achievements: The modern area couldn’t accomplish its general targets during the whole time of arranging except in the 1980s. During the initial Three Plans, against the objective of 7, 10.5 and 10.7 per cent current development rate, the real accomplishments were 6, 7.2, 9 per cent, separately. The hole between the objectives and accomplishments broadens from the Third Plan onwards.
Lack of Skilled and Efficient Personnel: The nation has been dealing with the shortage of specialised and effective workforce expected for the modern advancement of the country. Without any appropriately prepared and gifted workforce, it has become extremely challenging to deal with such exceptionally refined electronic apparatuses vital for the modern advancement of the country. Besides, the shortcomings and deceitfulness of those staff occupied with the modern area have been bringing about immense wastage of assets of the modern area. Besides, social elements like the fixed status of work and capital and the absence of legitimate drive and ventures concerning India’s individuals are also profoundly liable for this slow speed of Industrialisation.
Possible solutions
Consumer demand from the rural sector is projected to strengthen due to the better-than-expected monsoon, and we should expect greater growth in the consumer sector in the third quarter. Because inflation is expected to remain below acceptable bounds, the Reserve Bank may lower interest rates to boost the investment climate. However, the government has to take the lead. Ad hoc measures, on the other hand, would only provide a transient boost to growth. The government must create a favourable and supportive environment for a long-term solution. Extensive changes are needed in every area, including labour relations, policy solutions, infrastructure improvements, energy reforms, financial reforms, and skill enhancements, among other things. Along with the steps mentioned above, the red tape must be reduced to a bare minimum because, compared to other countries, the red tape plays a significant role in delaying certain investments while refusing others. Furthermore, the government cannot rely on any single action to spur growth; rather, a comprehensive approach is essential for varied growth to absorb India’s growing workforce profitably.
Conclusion
In Japan, population and economic activity are concentrated in dense urban centres and along coastal plains, despite two-thirds of the archipelago being hilly and forested. Japan’s economy grew slower in the 1990s than in the 1980s, with the GDP contracting during sections of the decade. Agricultural and industrial outputs both fell. Total road traffic grew significantly, as did final energy consumption and the economy’s energy intensity (energy usage per unit of GDP). Natural resources, such as energy, food, and other basic materials, heavily rely on imports in Japan’s economy.
Transport, agriculture, industry, and, in particular, the rise of energy demand and final private consumption are the most significant stresses on Japan’s environment today. Top priorities are urban air pollution (NOx, suspended particulate matter, and toxins), waste management, water eutrophication, nature conservation, climate change, chemical management, and international environmental cooperation. The Ministry of the Environment (which it replaced) was founded in 2001, 30 years after the Japan Environment Agency (which it replaced), with expanded or increased environmental duties, including waste management and international environmental cooperation.
