Profile
Settings
Refer your friends
Sign out
Analogy refers to a type of reasoning which tests the relationship between two substitutes and a conclusion is being drawn on the basis of the relationship. It states that various types of analogical relationships exist such as semantic, association, mathematical and logical. It further states that substituting the right substitute will assist the analogy problem in making it simpler and easy to understand. It signifies that effective detection of word relationships can help in examining what type of relations it is that are mathematical, logical and semantic relations. It finally states that effective selection of substitutes can accurately define the exact meaning of the word.
Analogy: Overview
Analogy can be stated as a part of reasoning which signifies the comparison between two identical words for arriving at a conclusive statement. It states that the effective identification process determines the true meaning of the word and also helps in improving the skills needed in specific areas of problem-solving based on analogy. It further states that detecting the correct relation helps in analysing the exact meaning and type of relation it is showcasing. It can be done by picking the right substitute for the detection process and analogy problem-solving. It further implies that connotation, as well as denotations, helps in improving the knowledge based on the relationships by choosing the correct substitute.
Analogical relationship: classification
Analogical relationships are of various types, in which six main types of analogical relationships are semantic, classification, mathematical, logical and association. Semantic relations state the relations that are meaningful associations comprising two or more entities, concepts and sets of entities. This can be further viewed as links directed between concepts that take part in relation. Classification refers to the detection of relation, which aims in predicting the relation between two entities included in a sentence. It further implies that the mutual restrictions and the type of entities in relation are formalised and are introduced in classification relation. Mathematical relationships refer to the collection of pairs which are ordered and contain one object out of each set. If an object x is from the first set and y is from the second set then it can be said as related if ordered pairs (x,y) are in relation. Logical relationships are stated to those relations who are being compared between elements of discourse that form its rationality which is either reasonableness and intelligibility. It is basically a path uniting two segments that might be logically related and not physically related. An associated relationship is a relationship uniting a connection in the specific objects and functions in sequential order.
Analogical substitutes
Substitutes are considered as the replacement of another word in a sentence or phrase to change the meaning of the entire sentence. Analogical substitutes are used when detecting the relationship process is initiated. It implies that detection requires replacement of a word to conclude the true meaning of the word and comparing it with the other word to define the accurate meaning of the sentence. It further implies that correct substituting of a word helps in the enhancement of skills related to analogy problems and the increase in the knowledge on vocabulary, antonyms, synonyms and deductive reasoning. Thus, choosing the right substitute to identify the analogical relationship will benefit in transforming complicated problems into simpler ones so that they can be clearly understood and formulated.
Conclusion
Detecting relationships plays a crucial part in the computation of analogy which states that correct analysing of relationships between two dissimilar words aids in enhancing the vocabulary as well as deductive reasoning in evaluating the analogy based problems. It concludes that choosing the right substitute makes the detection process simpler and helps to solve the complicated problem with ease. It further concludes that distinct words will be provided in analogy for which identification of their relationship will be required and state that if there is any existence of logical reasoning. It implies that the existence of the logical relations will conclude the true meaning of the distinct words by substituting a correct substitute.
