Introduction

The Directive Principle of State Policy is described in Part IV of the Indian Constitution (DPSP). The Directive Principles of State Policy were inspired from the Irish Constitution. The Directive Principles of State Policy are regulations authored into the Indian Constitution that control the State. However, you cannot oblige the State to impose people in a Court of Law. Whereas the Fundamental Right is legally valid. A prescriptive principle is a sequence of commands that legislators must follow when creating policy for citizens.

The Primary Strategy Of The Directive Principles:

If the Union or State government passes a law, it is the obligation of the Union or State government to comply with the fundamental principles of governmental policy. The health and wellbeing of the State is the primary objective of the Directive Principles of State Policy. One of the major purposes of the Directive Principles of State Policy is to accomplish the welfare system. The Directive Principle of State Design intends to increase residents’ socioeconomic conditions to live a comfortable life.

Separation Of The Judiciary And The Executive- Article 50 

Article 50 of the Indian Constitution explains the Separation of the Judicial system from the Executive. The judicial system is a separate entity. The judicial system is the constitution and bill of rights defenders. If the Executive commences operating like the judicial system, there will be a fight for power, so Article 50 differentiates the judicial system from the Executive. However, in certain cases, the Executive needs to perform judicial duties. They are assigned by the Executive, as is the instance of judges.

The definition of Separation of powers can be divided into three parts:

• A person who is a part of one organ should not be a part of another.
• One body should not obstruct the operation of the others.
• One body should not perform the role of another organ.

The notion of trias politica underpins the theory of power separation. This principle portrays a tripartite system in which capabilities are assigned and dispersed among three organs, each with its own regulatory authority.

The independence of the Judiciary is a necessary feature of the Rule of Law, which would be a fundamental characteristic of the Indian Constitution. The judicial system has to be independent of the executive compression and other pressure and expectations. However, the principle of democratic accountability must be restricted to the outer edges of the Indian Constitution and therefore can broaden further than that. The scope of judicial independence is wider in scope, trying to imply freedom from any stress or prejudice.

Consequences Of Separation Of The Judiciary And The Executive- Article 50 

The fundamental rule has two consequences. The first is that a Judge or Magistrate who gets to hear a specific instance cannot be linked to or take an interest in the court proceedings. Second, he should not be officially dependent on anyone implicated in the court proceedings for the defense involved.

It is inconceivable for a Judge to take an impartial perspective of the particular instance; he will attempt to do this if he is fully accountable for the achievement with one side or another. This is the very first point to recognize.

Article 50 of the Indian Constitution, as enshrined in the shape of Directly Principles in Part IV, requires the State to differentiate the Judicial branch from the Executive inside the State’s government services. According to one explanation, Article 50 of the Indian Constitution states for the detachment of the Judicial system overall from the Executive. However, a comprehensive review of the legislative record of Article 50 of the Indian Constitution uncovers that the main objective of Article 50 of the Indian Constitution was always the Separation of the Junior Judiciary from the Executive.

Conclusion 

We discussed Directive Principles of State Policy-Articles 50 and other related topics through the study material notes on Directive Principles of State Policy-Articles 50.

The achievement of a government can be evaluated by its guidelines and procedures. If the government failed to enforce the Directive Principle in the State correctly, this could lose the peoples confidence. Consequently, the Directive Principle of State Policy enforces a duty on the State to reach its objectives within the given timeframe stipulated by attempting to implement the principle. The Directive Principle of State Policy requires the government to enforce policy ideas for the benefit of society in an attempt to optimize citizens’ economic circumstances.