The Rowlatt Act

The Rowlatt Act, having Anarchical and Revolutionary crimes Act as the long name, was introduced by Sir Sidney Rowlatt of the Rowlatt committee. The implementations of this Act included strict and unfair restrainment of Indian citizens suspected for nationalist crimes.

The Rowlatt Act, which was also termed the Anarchical and Revolutionary Crimes Act was implemented on 18th March 1919. Laws of the Rowlatt Act were approved by the Imperial Legislative Council of British India’s senate. The legislation authorised the trial of some political matters but without juries and the imprisonment of suspected individuals without a proper court trial. Their goal was to eventually replace the restrictive provisions of the Defence of India Act, 1915 during the progressive events of the first World War. 

The Rowlatt Act was adopted in response to a perception of potential danger from revolutionary nationalists to entities of re-engaging in similar plots as during the war, for which the Government feared would be enabled by the expiry of the Defence of India Act.

In a concise way, The Rowlatt Act paved a way for the British India’s legislative council to put any civilian behind the bars without a proper judicial involvement. This Act enabled the government of British India to gain an upper hand over the country’s overall working aspects. 

Motives of the Rowlatt Act

The controversial British India legislation mandated tougher press control, warrantless arrests, prolonged imprisonment without trial, and juryless trials for prohibited political conduct. The convicts were denied the opportunity to know who was accusing them and what evidence was utilised in the trial. Individuals who were convicted were obliged to deposit security amounts and were barred from participating in any social, educational, civilian, or cultural activity after their release. On February 6, 1919, two proposals were filed in the Central Legislature based on the committee’s findings, which were chaired by Justice Sidney Rowlatt. These banknotes were known as the “Black Act.” They granted the police immense powers, including the ability to search a location and arrest anyone they objected to without the need for a warrant.

The Rowlatt Act was named after its executive, Sir Sidney Rowlatt, the act was passed on by the recommendations of the Rowlatt Committee and effectively authorised the colonial British government to detain any country folk suspected of committing nationalist crimes and is living in British India for up to two years, the Rowlatt Act gave the colonial authorities control to abolish all the revolutionary activities.

The Rowlatt Act, passed by the British colonial administration, as mentioned, gave officials the authority to arrest anybody for any cause. The Act’s objective was to quell the country’s burgeoning nationalist outburst. Mahatma  Gandhi called on the masses to engage in satyagraha in protest of the deed.

Effect of the Rowlatt Act on the citizens of British India

The Rowlatt Act was responsible for bringing Mahatma Gandhi into the forefront of India’s independence fight and reigning in the Gandhian era of the freedom struggle of India’s political history. 

The Rowlatt Act had the following effects on the political atmosphere in India-

  • People decided to organise hartals in places and railroads went on a strike.
  • Shops were shut down and demolished.
  • Indian officials were put behind the bars.
  • British Officers shot at a peaceful rally in Amritsar.
  • Martial law was implemented.

Among many other Indian leaders, Mahatma Gandhi was openly disdainful of the Act, arguing that innocent country folk should be penalised for individual political offences. In a protest against the measure, Madan Mohan Malaviya, and Muhammad Ali Jinnah, representatives of the All-India Muslim League, withdrew from the Imperial Legislative Council. The conduct also enraged several other Indian politicians as well as the general public, prompting the government to take oppressive actions. Gandhi and others believed that constitutional opposition to the act would be futile, so they staged a hartal on the 6th of April 1915. 

Conclusion

An enraged Indian public resented the Rowlatt Act. All of the council’s non-authorised Indian members, those who were denied official status in the colonial administration, opted against the acts. Mahatma Gandhi initiated a protest campaign that resulted in the Amritsar Massacre (April 1919) and, later, his non-cooperation movement (1920–22). The ordinances have never been put into effect. The Rowlatt Act, which became law on March 18, 1919, was passed by the Imperial Legislative Council, British India’s parliament. The act authorised the prosecution of suspected non-evidential nationalist political offences without the involvement of a judicial body and the detention of individuals without a court trial. Their purpose was to draft permanent legislation to override the  Defence of India Act’s restricted provisions (1915). The Rowlatt Act’s regulations were based on Justice Sidney Rowlatt’s 1918 commission.

faq

Frequently asked questions

Get answers to the most common queries related to the MPPSC Examination Preparation.

What was the Rowlatt Act of 1919?

Ans. During World War I, the British government implemented the Rowlatt Act, commonly known ...Read full

Why were Indians outraged by the Rowlatt Act?

Ans.The Rowlatt Act gave the British the authority to arrest anybody suspected of conspiring against the British Legislature. Thos...Read full

When was the Rowlatt Act repealed?

Ans. The Rowlatt Act was repealed in the year of 1922 due to the heavy objection shown by Mahatma Gandhi and the organised Hartals...Read full