It is the commonly used abbreviation for the Special Investigation Team, which is an important component of the Indian Investigation Team. In this article, we will discuss SIT and its features in detail.
What is the meaning of the SIT?
SIT stands for Special Investigation Team. They don’t get themselves involved in the matter from the start. They are involved and interested in the event when something really serious occurs and the current system is unable to respond. However, when it comes to a case involving a high-ranking official against whom many other institutions would shudder, incomes play a critical role. As a result, SIT will be involved in all of these paper-based research situations.
What kind of cases are being handled by SIT?
There are no specific types of cases that SIT members deal with. The majority of the time, you’ll see that it’s the high-profile cases that are being addressed. The SIT is looking into cases like the Gujarat riots and the 1984 anti-Sikh riots.
What is the work procedure of SIT?
The Supreme Court or the state government can establish a special inquiry team. The squad is led by a single individual. It examines the matter and prepares a report for the court to consider. At every level of the appeal, the report is scrutinized. The report might be accepted or rejected by the court. If the court rejects the report, the case will be decided by an appellate court.
Two deputy commissioners will lead the SITs, which will investigate alongside their teams. Any SIT constituted in this manner lacks the authority and purpose of the Court. The Court has the authority to approve or reject any SIT report. Any report produced by SIT will first be presented to the court of the first instance, where it will be reviewed at all levels of the appeal. If a report is rejected throughout the procedure, the case will be decided by the appeals court.
Who are the SIT members?
- Generally speaking, It is made up of retired High Court or Supreme Court justices. Other members can also be included. According to the Code of Criminal Procedure, it has the investigating officer
- When it comes to the maintenance of law and order, you can realize how significant SIT may be
- They are the ones that are transparent and honest in their judgments. They’ve helped a lot of people who were stuck in certain situations and have given them a better life. The retiring judge of the Treasury’s experience is put to good use over there. Because they already know what the optimal answer to any problem is, they may recommend it
- So, after reading this article, you can confirm that if you are stuck on something, there are many organizations that can help you out. The court has the authority to accept or reject the report on its own. If the court rejects the report, the sole alternative for deciding the case’s fate is to go to the appeal court
Difference between SIT and CBI
SITs (Special Investigation Teams) are temporary bodies constituted from time to time to investigate any issue or grievance. CBI is an executive organization formed under the Delhi Police Special Establishment Act, whereas SITs (Special Investigation Teams) are temporary bodies constituted from time to time to investigate any issue or grievance. SITs can be established by the judiciary, Parliament, or state legislatures. Their mission is to make decisions on a case-by-case basis.
Conclusion
By reading this article you now know who SIT is and how they are formed. Once you are able to understand the procedure of their work, it will be really easy for you to understand everything.
To summarize, the SIT is a group of highly trained Indian law enforcement officers tasked with investigating major crimes. It is constituted and ordered to begin looking into situations that have been left unfinished by other organizations. The SIT is frequently called into action when instances involving high-profile people arise. Celebrities, politicians, and even leaders of criminal or terrorist organizations are among those on the list.
When authorities lose in a case, they usually produce a report to the court explaining why the investigation was halted, such as corruption, compromise, prejudice, and a lack of information and resources. When authorities stop investigating matters under the Supreme Court’s jurisdiction, the SIT is tasked with reopening the probe.