Structure of Arguments

A point of view on a topic is expressed in an argument, which supports the point of view with facts, figures, and examples from the literature. It’s usual for experts in research-based professions to give arguments in order to learn more about their particular fields, even though arguments can occur in a variety of contexts, including political arenas, marketing efforts, and the business world.

Arguments

• Arguments are used by experts in a variety of fields to persuade audiences of particular viewpoints, promote participation with a point of view, and incite critical discussion about a particular subject. A versatile skill that can help professionals achieve lofty goals and make deft decisions is the ability to effectively articulate a case. While there are many other sorts of argument structures you can use when creating your own, there are a few key steps you can take to properly persuade your audience.
• Academics—philosophers in particular,study the best ways to deliver arguments and persuade audiences of a particular point of view in order to achieve this successfully. This study focuses on the idea of logical thinking, or the process of coming to a conclusion by following a set of organised stages. In order for an audience to deduce a conclusion, a conclusion must first be presented, followed by a premise and any supporting evidence. Professionals can influence an audience and nudge them toward adopting a specific perspective by making a compelling case. Professionals from a variety of industries can become effective problem solvers by learning to use logic strategically. They can use critical thinking techniques from this point on to manage communication skillfully, make wise judgments, and guide others.

Structure of Arguments

Dependency structures can accurately and succinctly represent argument structure, the component of a sentence’s structure that explains “who did what to whom.” However, they leave out a lot of information, much of which is essential to build a bridge between syntactic structure and the logical representations that semanticists normally utilise. A specific NP may be deleted or its grammatical relation altered by certain syntactic processes. Such procedures alter a sentence’s valency (see Valency and Argument Structure in Syntax). In these situations, it’s crucial to distinguish between the NPs’ initial and derived grammatical relations. As a result, in the passive, the original subject loses this grammatical relationship and the original direct object takes its place as the sentence’s subject. This leads to the conclusion that syntactic processes are frequently expressed in terms of initial syntactic relations that are absent from the derived, observable syntactic structure.

Logical argument structure

• A logical argument must have both the conclusion and the premise (s). The premises are the assertions that support the conclusion, whereas the conclusion is the assertion being supported. When a conclusion is made, words like “thus” and “hence” are frequently used to indicate it. Often, premise-identifying terms include “because” and “because.”
• A logical argument’s constituent parts can be assessed based on how well they work together. The premises should ideally be related to one another in a fashion that allows for the inference of additional true statements. The argument’s structure is explored abstractly in formal logic. In other words, one looks at the formal structure of the argument to see if the premises are consistent with the conclusion. In informal logic, the context of the argument is examined and a more specific interpretation is needed.

Example for structural argument

The claim is true: “The world’s largest concentration of bookstores is in Buenos Aires.”

Reasoning:

“How many bookstores can we not discover in a major area like Palermo, considering that only a little neighbourhood of the city like Recoleta may easily count more than ten bookstores? How many people will there be when the city has 48 residents? There isn’t another city with a percentage like that.

Conclusion

An argument is the spoken or written statement of reasoning used to logically attempt to prove the truth or falsity of a thesis or claim by connecting it to a number of conclusions. Numerous research utilising various forms of violation have looked into how verb argument structure information is processed. Predicate logic included a partial reflection of natural-language structure in its articulation of sub propositional predicate-argument structure, but propositional logic was created not for the study of language but for the formal study of mathematical reasoning.