Statement and Conclusion

Key Notes On Solving Linear Arrangement Questions, linear arrangement questions with answers, linear seating arrangement questions, linear arrangement tricks

Statement and Conclusion In the reasoning phase of Analytical Reasoning, passages or statements will be presented, followed by conclusions. Candidates must make decisions based on these statements and choose the appropriate conclusion from the options provided. In this context, the conclusion refers to the inference that can be drawn from the provided statement.

Different types of questions are asked on various government tests, making this portion of analytical reasoning one of the most important.

What is the definition of Statement and Conclusion Reasoning?

A statement is the arrangement of words into coherent sentences. A conclusion is a conclusion or judgment reached after considering the supplied statement. This area of analytical reasoning covers several question types, such as one statement with two conclusions, more than two statements with conclusions, etc.

A conclusion is an option or conclusion that is developed after a time of reflection or research on a set of provided facts or statements. Before obtaining a final result or conclusion or establishing a particular premise, it is necessary to study a subsequent impact. It takes a methodical and rational approach.

Types of statement and conclusion 

  1. Action Reason

In this form of statement and conclusion reasoning, inquiries are predicated on a specific action. If such an activity is always performed for a particular reason, then that reason exists.

  1. Cause and Effect

In this sort of statement and conclusion reasoning, questions are focused on the type of effects a given cause might have. If an action is performed and that action always produces a particular type of result, then it is unquestionably true and that effect would occur.

  1. Keywords

Understanding some often-used words, also known as keywords, is one of the most crucial components of analyzing this form of statement and conclusion reasoning. The most important function of keywords is to differentiate between absolutely true, possibly true, and absolutely false assertions.

In Standard Keywords, the statement’s adjectives, conjunctions, verbs, and adverbs convey information on the quantity and quality of a statement. Examples include some, none, never, always, occasionally, must be, etc.

How to Answer Questions Regarding Statements and Conclusions?

Here are a few guidelines you must follow to achieve the proper responses for the assertions and conclusions.

If two or more sentences are utilized to frame a statement, the sentences must be connected and contain a mutual contradiction.

Do not seek out true beliefs. You only need to use the information supplied in the statement to answer the question. No assumptions must be made.

Carefully read the statement and search for keywords shared by the statement and the conclusions.

If there is more than one relevant conclusion for the statement, ensure that the conclusions you have chosen are related in some way.

Do not judge a remark or statement by its length. Be sure to carefully examine the statement before drawing a conclusion.

Avoid attempting to predict the answers on this topic, since you may receive negative marks if you do.

Conclusion 

Analysis of Statement and Conclusion. Reasoning is one of the most important areas of a candidate’s knowledge of government tests. Candidates must make decisions based on statements and choose the appropriate conclusion from the options provided. This area of analytical reasoning covers several question types, including action and cause and effect. Use keywords to help students understand statement and conclusion reasoning.

Keywords distinguish between absolutely true, possibly true, and absolutely false assertions. If two or more sentences are utilized to frame a statement, they must be connected and contain a mutual contradiction. Do not judge a statement by its length; carefully examine the statement before drawing a conclusion.

faq

Frequently asked questions

Get answers to the most common queries related to the CAT Examination Preparation.

Statement - The Bank of England's decision to auction 25 metric tons of gold attracted many bargain-hunting bidders, but was criticized by major gold miners worldwide. Conclusion - The Bank of England should not sell the gold it has in order to maintain stable world gold prices. Bidders should quote greater gold prices to maintain the precious metal's current worth on international markets. (A)if only conclusion I follows (B) if only conclusion II follows (C) if either I and II follows (D) if neither I nor II follows and (E) if both I and II follow

Ans: Solution – D The statement does not criticize the sale but inste...Read full

Statement - Good voice is a natural talent, but the continued practice is required for improvement and success in the world of music. Conclusions: 1. Natural gifts require care and nourishment. 2. Even if your voice is poor, you can continue to practice. (A) if only conclusion I follows (B) if only conclusion II follows (C) if either I and II follows (D) if neither I nor II follows and (E) if both I and II follow

Ans: Solution – A Clearly, 1. is immediately supported by the sup...Read full

How many types of seating arrangements are there in reasoning?

Ans: There are five different types of seating questions. There are layouts that are rectangular, linear, circular, ...Read full

Statement - In Japan, the incidence of stomach cancer is significantly higher than that of colon cancer. In contrast, when the Japanese travel to Hawaii, the incidence of stomach cancer decreases but the incidence of colon cancer rises in the subsequent generation. All of this is related to nutrition; Japanese diets in Hawaii differ from those in Japan. Conclusions: 1. Japan should adopt the same diet as Hawaii. 2. The severity of colon cancer is less than that of stomach cancer. (A) if only conclusion I follows (B) if only conclusion II follows (C) if either I and II follows (D) if neither I nor II follows and (E) if both I and II follow

Ans: D The statement neither promotes any country’s diet nor comp...Read full

statement - The Minister questioned the value of the space research program and proposed that it be replaced with initiatives addressing felt national needs. Conclusions: 1. Space exploration does not contribute to pressing national demands. 2.The focus of research should be on national requirements. (A) if only conclusion I follows (B) if only conclusion II follows (C) if either I and II follows (D) if neither I nor II follows and (E) if both I and II follow

Ans:  E Clearly, the declaration...Read full