“Creating a hypothesis (or hypotheses) based on existing theory, and then designing a research plan to test the hypothesis” is the focus of a deductive method, which can be defined as “forming a research strategy to test the hypothesis.”
It has been said that “deductive reasoning” refers to thinking that moves from the specific to the general. If a certain theory or case example gives the impression that a certain causal relationship or link is inferred, then it is possible that this is the case in many situations. The purpose of a deductive design could be to determine whether or not this relationship or link does, in fact, hold true under more general conditions.
The hypotheses, which are used in the deductive method, are formed from the propositions of the theory in order to provide an explanation for the method. In other words, the deductive method focuses on drawing conclusions based on the premises or propositions that are presented.
In induction, the process starts with data, and then it looks for patterns within those observations, whereas in deduction, the process starts with a predicted pattern and then tests it against the observations.
The Benefits of Taking a Deductive Approach
The following are some of the benefits that can be gained from using a deductive approach:
- The opportunity to explain how concepts and variables are related to one another’s causes and effects
- Possibility of quantitatively measuring ideas and concepts
- Possibility of applying the findings of the research to a broader context to some extent
Approaches Inductive and Deductive are Both Available as Options
The deductive research approach investigates an existing theory or phenomenon and determines whether or not that theory is applicable to a set of specific conditions. It has been said that “the deductive approach follows the road of logic most closely,” and this observation has been supported by evidence. The line of thought begins with a theory and ultimately arrives at a new hypothesis. This hypothesis is put to the test by putting it head-to-head with observations that either lead to a confirmation of the hypothesis or lead to the hypothesis’s rejection.
In addition, “reasoning from the general to the particular” is one way to explain deductive reasoning, whereas “reasoning from the particular to the general” describes inductive reasoning. In other words, deductive research involves the formation of hypotheses as well as the testing of those assumptions during the research process, whereas inductive research does not deal with hypotheses in any way.
The Process of Deduction Entails a Few Separate Steps, which are as Follows
- Developing a hypothesis based on an existing theory.
- Putting hypotheses into language that may be operationalized and proposing links between two particular variables
- The testing of the hypothesis through the utilisation of the appropriate method (s). Quantitative approaches such as regression and correlation analysis, mean, mode, and median, as well as a few others, fall into this category.
- analysing the results of the test and deciding whether or not they support or contradict the theory. When analysing the results of the tests, it is essential to compare the findings of the research with the findings of the literature review.
- In cases where the hypothesis cannot be confirmed, the theory must be modified.
The Four Steps that Make up the Deductive Research Approach are as Follows
Start with a theory that already exists (and create a problem statement)
- Low-cost airlines almost always experience flight delays.
- All dogs have fleas
- Water is essential to the survival of all forms of life on earth.
Create a hypothesis that can be debunked based on the already accepted theory.
- If a passenger chooses to fly with a low-cost airline, then they should expect to always be delayed.
- Fleas can be found on every dog that lives in my apartment complex.
- Water is essential to the survival of all land mammals.
Gather evidence to put the hypothesis to the test.
- Gather information on the flights of low-cost carriers.
- Conduct flea inspections on all of the building’s dogs.
- Research should be done on every species of terrestrial animal to determine whether or not they require water.
Perform analysis and checks on the data.
- Only five out of every hundred flights on low-cost carriers do not experience a delay.
- Only ten of the twenty canines tested positive for fleas.
- Water is essential to the survival of every type of land animal.
Consider whether or not it is possible to reject the null hypothesis.
- 5 out of 100 flights on low-cost carriers do not experience delays; therefore, the hypothesis cannot be supported.
- That’s not enough evidence to support the theory, so we should reject it.
- Support for the concept that all terrestrial mammal species are dependent on water
Constraints Imposed by Taking a Logical Approach
The only way for the conclusions reached through deductive reasoning to be correct is if all of the premises established through inductive research are accurate, and if the words are unmistakable.
Example
All dogs have fleas (premise)
Benno is a dog, and he suffers from flea infestations (conclusion)
The conclusion that we have reached must be correct given the premises that we have. The conclusion that Benno has fleas, on the other hand, cannot be relied upon in the event that the first premise is found to be untrue.
Conclusion
A deductive approach “develops a hypothesis based on current theory and then designs a research strategy to test the hypothesis”
“Deductive” means “from the particular to the general.” A causal relationship or link implied by a theory or case study may be valid in many circumstances. A deductive design may evaluate if the relationship or link is held in more general situations.
The deductive approach is explained by hypotheses drawn from the theory’s assertions. Deductive reasoning involves drawing conclusions from premises.
Induction begins with observations and seeks a pattern within them, while deduction begins with a predicted pattern.