In this article, we will tell you about the State Human Rights Commission. Every state has a human rights commission that is responsible for protecting the human rights of the citizens residing in that particular state. Now, if you don’t know anything about this commission then you have landed on the right page. In this article, we will tell you what the human rights commission is, along with its composition, functions and powers.
The Protection of Human Rights Act of 1993 is the reason for the creation of the National Human Rights Commission. This act also allows the creation of the Human Rights Commission at the state level.Â
This body has to ensure that there is no violation of the human rights related to subjects covered under the state list (List-II) and concurrent list (List-III) of the seventh schedule of the Constitution of India. Currently, 26 states have already made their respective State Human Rights Commission.
The State Human Rights Commission consists of three members: a chairperson and two members. Let’s talk about all of them in detail:
A High Court Judge or a retired Chief Justice of a High Court can only be appointed as the chairperson of the Human Rights Commission.
Members who are serving or are retired High Court Judges or a District Judge can be appointed as the members. Although they also must have seven years of experience as a District Judge along with some practical knowledge of human rights.
The Chairperson is appointed by the governor. On the other hand, the members are selected if they receive recommendations of a committee consisting of the Chief Minister as its head including the Speaker of the Legislative Assembly.
Once the tenure is over they cannot apply for a job under the state government or the central government. However, the Chairperson can work for another term in the commission if he/she fits the age limit set by the human rights commission.
The major functions of the States Human Rights Commission are as follows:
The State Human Rights Commission doesn’t have a lot of powers. Unfortunately, their functions act as advisors to the government. The commission does not have the authority to punish the people who have violated human rights. It cannot even give monetary relief to the victim.
The State Human Rights Commission are wholeheartedly working to safeguard the human rights of the people. People have faith in them and trust they will never be deprived of their human rights. Citizens believe that if their rights are taken away then they will surely get help from the human rights commission. Although this commission is not perfect and has some flaws in it which is restricting the body to work more effectively.Â
There is a need to provide more power to the human rights commission. At the same time, the commission should be given the authority to provide monetary relief to the victims. The commission should also get the power to punish the victims. The interference of the state government in the decision making and working of the commission should be minimal.