De jure and de facto recognitions are the modes of recognition of the State. Recognition is the declaration of existence in terms. De facto recognition is provisional. It is the primary step to de jure recognition, which is fully recognised. When a regime changes, it is an existing State letting know the political entity of another State. Simple announcements cannot do it. The Montevideo Convention, 1933 implies four qualifications to be recognised, such as:

• Permanent population
• Definite territory
• Government
• Capacity to enter into relations with other States.

Recognition of government: When a state recognises a government, it acknowledges a group of persons as competent to act as an organ of the State in question and to represent it in terms of international law.

Legal Effects of Recognition

1. Recognised State becomes entitled to sue in the courts of the recognising State.
2. Recognized State is entitled to sovereign immunity for itself as well as its property in the courts of recognising State.
3. Recognized State is entitled succession and possession of property situated in the territory of the recognising State.
4. Recognised State may enter into diplomatic and treaty relationships with the recognising State (de jure recognition).
5. Recognising State gives effect to past legislative and executive acts of recognised State (retroactivity of recognition).

Check out the complete UPSC Syllabus

De Facto Recognition

Special cases arise where a legitimate government loses all or part of its power over the State and even flees abroad, becoming a government in exile, and this control is being exercised on the ground by a new, different government. It is called the De facto government. If a state maintains normal diplomatic relations with a new government, this is merely a declaration that the new government is effective but not that it is legitimate. One doctrine holds that a government that has come to power by coup d’état or revolution should not be recognised or regarded as legitimate until it has received democratic confirmation.

De Jure Recognition

When a regime changes by revolt, the legitimate government loses all its power. Even though in practice, the former government sometimes continues to be recognised as the legitimate government (the de jure government), even if it has lost effective control of the State – at least temporarily.

Change of regime can happen in 2 ways:

1. Normal course ( constitutional way)
2. Coup d’ eat’ (revolt or revolution)

Also see: UPSC Preparation Books

Difference between De Jure And De Facto 

Examples of De Facto and De Jure

Recognition of the Soviet Union was done in 1917. It was de facto recognised by the government of the UK in 1921, but it was not given de jure recognition until 1924. Bangladesh was established in March 1971. India and Bhutan recognised it just after 9 months of establishment, but the United States gave it legal recognition after nearly 1 year in April 1972.

Also read about How to Prepare for UPSC without Coaching

Doctrines of Recognition

1. Tobar Doctrine: (No Recognition for Unconstitutional Governments) Named after Carlos Tobar, Foreign Relations Minister of Ecuador, the doctrine states that government recognition should only be granted if its administration came to power by legitimate democratic means.
2. Estrada Doctrine: (Recognise Existence of Government, not Legitimacy): As per this doctrine, recognition of government should be based on its de facto existence rather than its legitimacy. It is as per the principles of non-intervention and self-determination of all nations. This does not let states to assess the legitimacy of governments of each other.
3. Stimson Doctrine: (Named after American Secretary of State, Stimson): This doctrine pledged, “Not to recognise international territorial changes brought about by the aggression.” The doctrine was applying a principle, ‘ex injuria jus non-oritur’, which means an illegal act cannot create law.
4. Betancourt Doctrine (No Recognition for Military Rules): This doctrine became the cause of isolation of Venezuela, denying the “diplomatic recognition of any regime that came to power by military force.”

Conclusion

Recognition means an existing State letting know the political entity of another State. Recognition helps a state or government enormously by all means. There are legal effects of recognition, such as the Recognised State becoming entitled to sue in the courts of the recognising State. Recognized State is entitled to sovereign immunity for itself and its property in the courts of the recognising State. Above all, it is entitled to succession and possession of property situated in the territory of the recognising State. It may enter into diplomatic and treaty relationships with the recognising State (de jure recognition). 

Recognising State affects past legislative and executive acts of recognised State (retroactivity of recognition). When a regime changes through a revolt, the former government is sometimes recognised as the legitimate government (the de jure government).