Jatin Verma is teaching live on Unacademy Plus
DAILY THE HINDU EDITORIAL ANALYSTS. By Jatin Verma, Educator, Unacademy unacademy
Jatin Verma ure https://unacademy.com/useratinverma71 emy Home Explore Plus Search Courses, Topics & Educators 0 minutes today Jatin 10 creaits Jatin Verma Edit Protile Have appeared in UPSC CSE thrice. Have been taking Unacademy Plus courses since November 2017. Academics-Polity, Economics n Pub Admn 734,591 This month views 10,160,566 Lifetime Views Courses 231k Followers 6 Following What all can you expect in daily lessons? Indian Polity and By Jatin Verma By Jatin Verma ay Jatin Verma (Hindi) March 2018: The Hindu Daily News and Editorial... March 2018: The Hindu Daily News and Editorial Analysis by... February 2018: The Hindu Daily News and Editorial Analysis.. 66 Lessons 6Lessons 14 Lessons 913 ratings 158 reviews 125 ratings-28 reviows 395 ratings-58 reviews
C Secure hetps latin Verma Jatin Home Facebook: jatinverma0509 WORK HARD in silence, let success make the Update Cover Photo .Youtube: IAS Tayari with Jatin Verma Telegram: jatinverma05 Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org NOISE- Up ane nfo View Actveity Log 10 Timeline About Friends 2007 Photos More /Co pos* Post ) PhetalVideo D' Live video LifeEvent hs on your mind? Intro his is your account only name is mine Public Worked ar atin Ve WenttoStJaSepts Colege Nanital
Editorial-1: Defving the logic of democracy: On simultaneous polls inherent problems A great deal has been written and said on the advantages and disadvantages of simultaneous elections ever since Prime Minister began to speak of this practice as a good thing. Arguments: The argument that simultaneous elections will prevent corruption, and improve administrative efficiency has been dismissed as flimsy. There is another objection to the proposal that should be, perhaps, taken seriously. The implications of holding simultaneous elections to the Parliament and State Assemblies run contrary to the spirit of democracy, as well as that of federalism. .Admittedly, Mr. Modi does not want to touch the relationship between the Central and State governments. What he wants is clear and undisturbed five years of rule between elections, so that his projects of governance can be consolidated. Rhetoric of governance replace the logic of democracy. In other countries, we have seen the rhetoric of governance replace the logic of democracy. We have arrived at the same juncture. Arguments that juxtapose governance and democracy simply overlook the fact that governance is about administration, democracy is about popular sovereignty .
We expect governments to give us good governance, but not at the cost of democracy. In contemporary history, populist leaders have rallied people around the banner of good governance, but forgotten the D of democracy. We might need to remember the basics of the system. . Democratic concepts: Democracy is a protean concept, justified for many reasons, and some of these reasons are purely instrumental. y, for instance, enables a peaceful transfer of power from one political elite to another. It is, relatively speaking, more economical than authoritarian governments, which spend an inordinate amount of money in suppressing dissent. And above all, democracy provides legitimacy and enables accumulation of power in the name of 'the people'. The Dilemma of Democracy: The idea that democracy is valuable because it secures a designated good, however, poses a dilemma. If tomorrow a benevolent despot provides these goods, is democracy dispensable? .
Democrats will have to find reasons why democracy is a good in itself and not because it leads to desired outcomes. .Arguably, democracy is a good because it initiates, fosters and sustains a conversation the ruled (and this i5 between the rulers and the ruled (and this is what periodic, asynchronous elections at the Centre and States help in). Elections constitute definitive moments in this conversation. They (a) enable the selection of candidates who will speak for and to the citizens; and (b) allow citizens to hold representatives responsible That is, elections ensure a necessary correlation between the interests of the citizens and the accountability of the ruling class. .In between 5 yearly elections, citizens can hold the rulers responsible for all acts of omission and commission through participation in movements, campaigns and other modes of representation in civil society Citizens and their representatives thus engage in continuous conversations. Elections facilitate and develop the conversation between citizens and representatives. Elections are not equivalent to democracy; they are a definitive component of the democracy project. .
Theory of Democratic State: Basic nature of State Contract. Unlike direct democracy, modern democracies are based upon the principle of representation. All elected representatives 'stand in' for their constituents in legislatures, but the responsibility of the ruling party is much more. It has to represent the interests of even those citizens who did not vote for it. If it fails to do so, and if the Opposition can muster the numbers in the legislature, it can vote the government out and provide an alternative government. Alternatively, the country can go to the polls to elect a new government. Conundrum of Simultaneous Elections: Under the proposed scheme, if the government fails to heed the mandate given by citizens, but the Opposition cannot offer an alternative government, and elections cannot be held before the stipulated time, the government will continue to rule, but illegitimately. This is the conundrum of simultaneous elections
Accessible governments Representative democracies are based upon two crucial preconditions One of these preconditions is that citizens must be well-informed on affairs of the state, the region, the local, and the global, before they make choices that are reasonably intelligent. In large and unwieldy socicties like India, citizens should be able to distingu ish between national issues, for example foreign policy and defence, and local issues that affect their quotidian lives, lack of education and health, the pathetic state of roads and water bodies, provision of infrastructure, and ease of living one's life in relative autonomy from political intervention. The case for a federal form of government is constructed precisely on the need for decentralised power, decentralised finances, and accessible governments. Across the world the trend is towards regional autonomy. In India where this demand has acquired serious proportions in many parts of the country, any push towards the standardisation of elections will exacerbate the problem.
Two, citizenship lies at the heart of electoral democracy. Citizens are stake-holders in the political system- therefore, they have the right to participate in processes of decision-making that affect them individually and collectively Spaces of Citizenship Participation in national and State elections expands the spaces of citizenship. Imagine the dismal political scenario if the timing of all elections is controlled. No periodic elections, no sound, no fury, no old and tired political agendas we attack, no new faces in politics, no stand-offs. This is the time to choose who we want to enter into a conversation with. Frequent Elections Vs. Simultaneous Elections If citizens have a right to exercise control on the representative, or the political party of whiclh she is a part, they should be given an opportunity to do so through frequent elections. There is nothing like the electoral arena to expose politicians and party agendas to popular judgment. This keeps the conversation on democracy going. . It keeps up the pressure on the representative to deliver on promises. A fixed system of elections provides representative with a god-given chance to ignore the constituency for five years and come back only during the silly season.
Polls a good force Finally, many and repeated elections are good for democracy for another reason Democracy is not based upon faith in representatives, it is based on suspicion That is why we feel the need to stalk and monitor our representatives. . Suspicion, as Demosthenes, the Athenian statesman and orator (384-322 BCE) wrote, is the best protection against despots We should have the opportunity of dismissing the very candidate we voted for in the previous election We should be provided with the chance of vesting our confidence, provisionally, in another set of candidates Political sociologists call this phenomenon the circulation of elites. We don't trust our representatives. We subject them to reasoned scepticism. This is the best protection against . managed democracy