Sign up now
to enroll in courses, follow best educators, interact with the community and track your progress.
Enroll
30
Download
Course Overview
139 plays

More
Course Overview

Venkatesan S
IIM Bangalore Alumni | Cleared CAT 2015 | Cleared IIM B, C, L, K & I

U
Unacademy user
Mam ye course Hindi mai available hai please mam if yes then Please provide link of that please mam🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Singh Himanshu
8 months ago
For hinfi you can find similar course by Aman trivedi.
Singh Himanshu
8 months ago
Hindi *
Dexterous DD
8 months ago
thank u Bhai 😊
  1. CAT 2018: Data Interpretation Course Overview Venkatesan S IIMB Alumnus


  2. Who am I? e Venkatesan S e MBA IIM Bangalore B.E. -College of Engineering Guindy Cleared CAT in 2015 - First Attempt Received calls from all IMs and converted. e Educator since April 2018


  3. What are all my other Courses? Time, Speed & Distance, Time & Work, * Averages, Mixtures & Alligations, Logical Reasoning. Data Interpretation, * What to expect from B-Schools, e Percentages, e Many Strategy Lessons


  4. Course Overview 8 Questions. Slot 1-4 questions Calculation based 1 nos (Easy) Reasoning Based 3 nos (Difficult) Multi layered Pie-Chart Venn Diagram Slot 2- 4 questions Venn Diagram Profitability Sales


  5. CAT 2018: Logical Reasoning Question 5 Venkatesan S IIMB Alumnus


  6. Seven candidates, Akil, Balaram, Chitra, Divya, Erina, Fatima, and Ganeshan, were invited to interview for a position. Candidates were required to reach the venue before 8 am. Immediately upon arrival, they were sent to one of three interview rooms: 101, 102, and 103. The following venue log shows the arrival times for these candidates. Some of the names have not been recorded in the log and have been marked as? Time 7:10 AM 7:15 AM 7:25 AM 7:30 AM 7:40 AM 7:45 AM Person Akil,? Chitra Fatima


  7. Additionally here are some statements from the candidates: Balaram: I was the third person to enter Room 101. Chitra: I was the last person to enter the room I was allotted to. Erina: I was the only person in the room I was allotted to. Fatima: Three people including Akil were already in the room that I was allotted to when I entered it. Ganeshan: I was one among the two candidates allotted to Room 102.


  8. What best can be said about the room to which Divya was allotted? 1. Definitely Room 102 2. Definitely Room 101 3. Either Room 101 or Room 102 4. Definitely Room 103


  9. Who else was in Room 102 when Ganeshan entered? 1. Divya 2. Akil 3. No one 4. Chitra


  10. When did Erina reach the venue? 1. 7:10 am 2. 7:25 am 3. 7:15 am 4. 7:45 am


  11. Seven candidates, Akil, Balaram, Chitra, Divya, Erina, Fatima, and Ganeshan, were invited to interview for a position. Candidates were required to reach the venue before 8 am. Immediately upon arrival, they were sent to one of three interview rooms: 101, 102, and 103. The following venue log shows the arrival times for these candidates. Some of the names have not been recorded in the log and have been marked as? Time 7:10 AM 7:15 AM 7:25 AM 7:30 AM 7:40 AM 7:45 AM Person Akil,? Chitra Fatima


  12. What best can be said about the room to which Divya was allotted? 1. Definitely Room 102 2. Definitely Room 101 3. Either Room 101 or Room 102 4. Definitely Room 103


  13. Who else was in Room 102 when Ganeshan entered? 1. Divya 2. Akil 3. No one 4. Chitra 101 102 Ganeshan Chitra 103 Akil Erina Balaram Fatima


  14. If Ganeshan entered the venue before Divya, when did Balaram enter the venue? 1. 7:15 am 2. 7:25 am 3. 7:45 am 4. 7:10 am


  15. If Ganeshan entered the venue before Divya, when did Balaram enter the venue? 1. 7:15 am 2. 7:25 am 3. 7:45 am 4. 7:10 am 101 Akil Divya Balaram Fatima 102 Ganesharn Chitra 103 Erina ime 7:10 AM 7:15 AM 7:25 AM 7:30 AM 7:40 AM 7:45 AM Person Akil,? Chitra Fatima


  16. CAT 2018: Logical Reasoning Question 6 Venkatesan S IIMB Alumnus


  17. What is the weight of the faculty quality parameter? 1.0.3 2.0.4 3.0.1 4. 0.2


  18. An agency entrusted to accredit colleges looks at four parameters: faculty quality (F), reputation (R), placement quality (P), and infrastructure (I). The four parameters are used to arrive at an overall score, which the agency uses to give an accreditation to the colleges. In each parameter, there are five possible letter grades given, each carrying certain points: A (50 points), B (40 points), C (30 points), D (20 points), and F (0 points). The overall score for a college is the weighted sum of the points scored in the four parameters. The weights of the parameters are 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 in some order, but the order is not disclosed Accreditation is awarded based on the following scheme: Range Accreditation Overall score > 45 35 < Overall Score<45 BAA 25 c Overall Score < 35 15c= Overall Score < 25 BBB Overall Score < 15 BBA Junnk


  19. Eight colleges apply for accreditation, and receive the following grades in the four parameters (F, R, P, and I): It is further known that in terms of overall scores: 1. High Q is better than Best Ed; 2. Best Ed is better than Cosmopolitan; and 3. Education Aid is better than A-one Tot 50 50 50 40 190 40 30 20 20 110 A- One Best Ed Cosmopolitan 40 20 20 30 110 Dominance Education Aid 50 50 40 50 190 Fancy Global High Q 20 20 40 30 110 50 50 40 40 180 30 0 30 20 20 40 110 20 20 70


  20. Eight colleges apply for accreditation, and receive the following grades in the four parameters (F R, P, and I): It is further known that in terms of overall scores: F RTot 1. High Q is better than Best Ed; 2. Best Ed is better than Cosmopolitan; and 3. Education Aid is better than A-one. High Q Best Ed Cosmopolitan 40 20 20 30 110 30 20 20 40 110 40 30 20 20 110 Education Aid 50 5040 50 190 The weights of the parameters are 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and A-One 0.4 in some order, but the order is not disclosed. 50 50 50 40 190


  21. The weights of the parameters are 0.1, 0.2, 0.3 and 0.4 in some order, but the order is not disclosed Tot High Q 30 20 20 40 110 8 12 28 Best Ed 40 30 20 20 110 12 2 28 R>I> F F 0.2 R 0.4 P 0.1 1-0.3 Cosmopolitan 40 20 20 30 110 Education Aid 50 50 40 50 190 A- One 50 50 50 40 190


  22. F 0.1 R-0.4 P 0.2 1-0.3 50 50 50 40 40 30 20 20 Cosmopolitan 40 20 20 30 40 30 Education Aid 50 50 40 50 40 40 20 20 30 20 20 40 Tot 20 10 12 47 26 25 27 15 48 12 45 13 12 27 A One A One Best Ed Cosmopolitan 4 Dominance Education Aid 5 Fancy Global High Q Best Ed 12 4 Dominance 20 20 20 8 Fancy Global High Q 50 50 20 8 30 0 4


  23. How many colleges receive the accreditation of AAA?


  24. What is the highest overall score among the eight colleges?


  25. Each of the 23 boxes in the picture below represents a product manufactured by one of the following three companies: Alfa, Bravo and Charlie. The area of a box is proportional to the revenue from the corresponding product, while its center represents the Product popularity and Market potential scores of the product (out of 20). The shadings of some of the boxes have got erased The companies classified their products into four categories based on a combination of scores (out of 20) on the two parameters - Product popularity and Market potential as given below Promising Blockbuster Doubtful No-hope >10 >10 >10 Product popularity score Market Potential Score <=10 > 10 <=10 < = 10 <= 10 0 2468 10 12 14 16 8 2 Product popularity


  26. Considering all companies' products, which product category had the highest revenue? 1. No-hope 2. Doubtful 3. Promising 4. Blockbuster


  27. Which of the following statements is NOT correct? 1. Alfa's revenue from Blockbuster products was the same as Charlie's revenue from Promising products 2. Bravo and Charlie had the same revenues from No-hope products 3. The total revenue from No-hope products was less than the total revenue from Doubtful products 4. Bravo's revenue from Blockbuster products was greater than Alfa's revenue from Doubtful products


  28. 20 18 16 14 12 10 0 2 46 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 Product popularity Bravo Chartie


  29. The following facts are known: Type 1. Alfa and Bravo had the same number of products in the Blockbuster category. Promising 2. Charlie had more products than Bravo but fewer products than Alfa in the No-hope category Blockbuster Doubtful 3. Each company had an equal number of products in the Promising category. No Hope


  30. 4. Charlie did not have any product in the Doubtful category, while Alfa had one product more than Bravo in this category. Type Promising 5. Bravo had a higher revenue than Alfa from products in the Doubtful category. Blockbuster R+ 6. Charlie had a higher revenue than Bravo from products in the Blockbuster category. Y+1 Y R+ 0 Doubtful Z+ No Hope


  31. 7. Bravo and Charlie had the same revenue from products in the No-hope category 8. Alfa and Charlie had the same total revenue considering all products. Type Promising # X Blockbuster R+ Y+1 Y R+ 0 Doubtful Z+ No Hope


  32. 18 16 14 Type 12 Promising 10 Blockbuster Doubtful No Hope 0 2 468 10 1 14 16 18 20 Product popularity Charlie


  33. If the smallest box on the grid is equivalent to revenue of Rs.1 crore, then what approximately was the total revenue of Bravo in Rs. crore? 1. 24 2. 30 3. 40 4. 34


  34. If the smallest box on the grid is equivalent to revenue of Rs.1 crore, then what approximately was the total revenue of Bravo in Rs. crore? 1. 24 2. 30 3. 40 4. 34