Sign up now
to enroll in courses, follow best educators, interact with the community and track your progress.
Enroll
632
Download
Overview about the Course (in Hindi)
3,267 plays

More
How to prepare for this exam .an overview about the course

Dr ranjeeta
I am a doctor ,selected in upsc cse 2013 , currently posted . love to share my knowledge in explaining concepts logically .

Comments
(9)
U
Unacademy user
KM
• If we want to create a robust judicial system at the subordinate level and a rich pool to draw from for the appointment of high court and, later, Supreme Court judges, the constitution of an Indian judicial service is a sound idea. • The idea was first mooted by the Law Commission in the 1950s; The Constitution of India was amended in 1977 to provide for an All-India Judicial Services and The Chief Justices conferences in 1961, 1963, and 1965 also favoured creation of the service. However, each time it was faced with opposition. • Recently, The Government supported All-India Judicial Services (AIJS)saying that it will help promote federal governance: under this, *the district judges will be recruited centrally through an all-India examination. * They will then be allocated to each State along the lines of the All-India Services. • The advantages are: *Efficiency and efficacy of judiciary would be increased. *Transparent and efficient method of recruitment would be followed and Corruption, nepotism etc would be strongly dealt. * The pendency and issue of delay of cases would be done away. *Best legal talent across the country would be selected on the basis of merit. *Public faith in the judiciary would be restored. • There are some concerns also exist: *an issue of local laws differences, Local languages and dialects, Unremunerative pay. *the judiciary has fewer avenues for growth, promotion and limited avenues for career advancement; * It will be against the Independence of Judiciary as some other body will have a control in appointment and integration because in the judiciary, higher level controls and evaluates lower level. • Despite the limitations, the establishment of AIJS makes a strong case because, if Civil servants can learn the local language of the state, even a judicial service officer can. Pay scale, issue of transfers, career growth etc should be looked after. After the selection, a Judicial service officer can be provided sufficient training to handle the job. • A meritocratic judiciary is the need of the hour. It is in the interest of all concerned that cases should be disposed of as quickly as possible, which will be possible if there are adequate judges and it would be possible if they recruited in large strength through AIJS just like in case of civil services. Hence there should be no more delay.
mam please complete the course asap... ..thank u
Dr ranjeeta
9 months ago
Yes
thank you ma'am
View More