Please Login To Continue
CA Foundation Case Study 14 Ganga Saran V. Ram Charan Ram Gopal (Hindi)
Lesson 14 of 14 • 13 upvotes • 10:19mins
Sudhir Sachdeva
This case study helps to understand the scenario when a party cannot take benefit of Impossibility of performance or doctrine of frustration in case of contingent contracts. The reason behind is the fault of the party to contract who was to perform a part of the contract.
(Hindi) Indian Contract Act 1872 - Case Studies: CA Exams
14 lessons • 2h 3m
1
CA Foundation Case Study 1 Balfour V. Balfour (in Hindi)
9:03mins
2
CA Foundation Case Study 2 Mrs.Carlill V. Carbolic Smokeball Co (in Hindi)
8:47mins
3
CA Foundation Case Study 3 Harris V. Nickerson (in Hindi)
8:07mins
4
CA Foundation Case Study 4 Lalman Shukla V. Gauri Dutt (in Hindi)
8:26mins
5
CA Foundation Case Study 5 Felthouse V. Bindley (in Hindi)
8:48mins
6
CA Foundation Case Study 6 Durga Prasad V. Baldeo (in Hindi)
8:29mins
7
CA Foundation Case Study 7 Chinnaya V. Ramaya (in Hindi)
9:17mins
8
CA Foundation Case Study 8 Shuppu Ammal V. Subramaniam (in Hindi)
8:25mins
9
CA Foundation Case Study 9 Devraje V. Ram Krishnaiah (Hindi)
8:22mins
10
CA Foundation Case Study 10 Raj Laxmi Dabee V. Bhootnath Mukherjee (Hindi)
8:26mins
11
CA Foundation Case Study 11 Collins V. Godefroy (Hindi)
9:19mins
12
CA Foundation Case Study 12 Taylor V. Caldwell (Hindi)
9:00mins
13
CA Foundation Case Study 13 Howell V. Coupland (Hindi)
8:21mins
14
CA Foundation Case Study 14 Ganga Saran V. Ram Charan Ram Gopal (Hindi)
10:19mins
Crack CA Foundation with Unacademy
Get subscription and access unlimited live and recorded courses from India's best educators
Structured syllabus
Daily live classes
Ask doubts
