20 Years Teaching Experience   || 5,00,000+ Youtube Subscribers || More than 30000 Students Taught Online 

Sudhir Sachdeva

This course will help you to solve multiple case studies relating to Indian Contract Act 1872.
We will discuss popular case laws decided by various courts and learn the provisions of law with the help of case studies.

Choose from the various concepts taught in a comprehensible way for students looking to strengthen their CA preparation.

CA Foundation

Hindi

(Hindi) Indian Contract Act 1872 - Case Studies: CA Exams

Acts in the Constitution

Mercantile Laws

CPT - Old Syllabus

CA, CS, and CMA

Ace the toughest competitive and government exams in India 

Test Preparation

CPT (Common Proficiency Test) - Old Syllabus 

Learn Various Acts in the Constitution

Agreements without intention to file a suit are not enforceable in a court of law. Domestic Agreements do not have enforceability due to lack of Intention to file a suit at the time of making the agreements.

CA Foundation Case Study 1 Balfour V. Balfour (in Hindi)

In case of General offer (which is made to public at large) acceptance need not be communicated. It is sufficient for the offeree / Acceptor that he fulfills the conditions posed by the offeror.

CA Foundation Case Study 2 Mrs.Carlill V. Carbolic Smokeball Co (in Hindi)

Offer is different from Invitation to an Offer. Invitation to an Offer is only a prelude to an Offer. Acceptance can only be given to an Offer and not to Invitation to an Offer.

CA Foundation Case Study 3 Harris V. Nickerson (in Hindi)

Offer must be communicated to the offeree. An acceptance can only be given by the Acceptor only if he knows about the offer. Without the knowledge of the offer, acceptance given by the offeree / Acceptor has no value and will not constitute a contract.

CA Foundation Case Study 4 Lalman Shukla V. Gauri Dutt (in Hindi)

Mental acceptance is No acceptance. Acceptance should be communicated and without it's communication, the offeror cannot presume the acceptance. Acceptance whether it is expresses or implied, should be given to make a valid contract.

CA Foundation Case Study 5 Felthouse V. Bindley (in Hindi)

This case study is based on the very important provision of law regarding consideration. This provides that Consideration must move at the desire of the promise and not at the desire of any other person.

CA Foundation Case Study 6 Durga Prasad V. Baldeo (in Hindi)

This case talks about the Provisions of the Indian Contract Act regarding Consideration. Stranger to Contract cannot sue but stranger to Consideration can sue provided he is a party to contract. Thus beneficiary of a contract can claim his right.

CA Foundation Case Study 7 Chinnaya V. Ramaya (in Hindi)

Exceptions to the Rule , "No Consideration, No Contract". Female beneficiary to a Contract can file a suit for maintenance even if she is not a party to Contract.

CA Foundation Case Study 8 Shuppu Ammal V. Subramaniam (in Hindi)

In this video we will discuss Acknowledgement of a Debt as an Exception to the Principle, "No Consideration No Contract"

CA Foundation Case Study 9 Devraje V. Ram Krishnaiah (Hindi)

This case study helps you to understand the exceptions of the "No Consideration, No Contract".
Where the agreement becomes a valid contract if it is between the parties in near relation, it is in writing, registered and made out of Natural Love and affection, even if there is no consideration.

CA Foundation Case Study 10 Raj Laxmi Dabee V. Bhootnath Mukherjee (Hindi)

This case study talks about the essential elements of valid Consideration. As per this, consideration must be something which a person is not already legally or contractually bound to do.

CA Foundation Case Study 11 Collins V. Godefroy (Hindi)

This case study explains the common law of Impossibility where the performance of the contract becomes impossible due to unavoidable circumstances.

CA Foundation Case Study 12 Taylor V. Caldwell (Hindi)

In this video we discussed how a valid contract becomes void due to uncontrollable circumstances which are beyond the control of the parties. Therefore , the parties who become unable to perform they are not held liable for paying compensation.

CA Foundation Case Study 13 Howell V. Coupland (Hindi)

This case study helps to understand the scenario when a party cannot take benefit of Impossibility of performance or doctrine of frustration in case of contingent contracts. The reason behind is the fault of the party to contract who was to perform a part of the contract.

CA Foundation Case Study 14 Ganga Saran V. Ram Charan Ram Gopal (Hindi)

myself richa bansal... by profession I m chartered accountant

Richa Bansal

Capacity & free consent of parties as per Indian Contract Act along with Void Agreements as per Indian Contract Act

(Hindi) Part-2: Indian Contract Act

Founder of KD Commerce Classes,
Phd pursuing from Lucknow university,
JRF Qualified with 99 Percentile marks in Commerce and Masters in both

Uma Kant

This course helps you in understanding the  concepts of Mercantile laws, all the important topics are studied in better way,  and the content is also effective as per the exams requirement.

(Hindi) Mercantile Laws (CA, Exams)

CA by training-Educator by passion
Review my courses if you like them🙏That is my real earning!
Use code AASHISHS10 

Aashish Sachdev

The course is on The Sale of Goods Act, 1930 and covers all the basics and related provisions. The course is on The Sale of Goods Act, 1930 and is made keeping in view the needs of CA-CPT and CA- FOUNDATION students. However, it may be useful for graduation, CS, CMA students and other learners.

The Sale of Goods Act 1930 - Mercantile Laws

MBA -Finance || 2 years exp. in corporate sector || 9 years exp. in teaching || winner of educator of the week at unacadmy.


Sonam Rani

In this course discuss about all the related Concept related to sales of goods act 1930. This Course is beneficial for CA aspirants.

Lessons

14 lessons • 2h 3m