Introduction: Like any other resource, money is also available in a limited quantity to the government. So, it must be distributed and utilised by various government bodies judiciously and effectively. Thus, our constitution has clearly defined how the direct and indirect taxes or any other form of earning that the government makes should be divided between the state and the centre.
These specific factors in the constitution authorises the central government with residual power.
However, a few taxes are not entirely kept by any of the parties. In some cases, the taxes are levied by the Central Government but collected and used by the state government, with the Central Government having no say in how they use those funds. Examples of such duties include stamp duties. At the same time, some taxes are collected by the Central Government but are then allocated to the same states from where they were collected. An example includes duties levied on succession and estate duties on non-agricultural land.
Still, there are taxes defined and collected by the Central Government, but the collected amount is shared with the State Government. Two major examples of such taxes are Income Tax and Union Excise duties. The ratio in which the collected amount is divided between the two bodies is calculated by the Finance Commission, considering both parties’ needs. The President of India appoints the finance commission for five years.
These sources are inadequate for the weaker states to carry out their development programs. Thus, the constitution provides aid, i.e. grants-in-aid, which are to be made by the Union to states for their assistance in developing and promoting welfare in tribal areas.
The constitution of India sets a finance committee for the suggestion of state shares. These schemes are released to model the financial relations between Union and the states to be more flexible and pliant towards requisites.
Some suggestions delineated by the 13th finance commission for the year 2010-15 are outlined below:
Each state’s share of financial resources is distributed according to four criteria established by the Finance Commission of India. These four criteria are:
Based on the above criteria, Uttar Pradesh is provided with the highest financial resources, i.e. 19.677 percent.
Conclusion:
Apart from the Finance Commission, commissions such as the Planning Commission also assign funds to state governments based on needs and levels of development. Regardless of the number of criteria for allocating funds to states, the financial motive is to make each state financially independent by granting capital for their disposal.