Management is the process of classifying and arranging a company’s resources and actions to achieve particular objectives most effectively and efficiently feasible. The execution of activities within stated schedules to produce tangible results is a measure of management effectiveness.
Science is a systematised body of information developed via logical consistency, critical examination, and experimental investigation. As a result, science possesses the following characteristics:
Science is a body of information that has been organised. Its ideas are founded on cause-and-effect relationships, which means that a specific component can be explained in a specific way by another factor.
For example, if you throw a ball up, the ball will eventually return to the ground due to the gravitational force of the earth. There is a lack of such a cause-and-effect relationship in management; cause-and-effect relationships are described in a flexible, not definite, manner. As a result, management is not a scientific discipline.
Principles in science are derived through trials carried out in laboratories. Such ideals are put to the test again and over again before being approved. This isn’t always the case in management; many management ideas are founded on personal views and experiences.
Even though experiments are carried out under controlled conditions, their results are not put to the test in the same way that science is. Management, in this perspective, is not true science.
Anyone may validate scientific principles. The findings of such verification will be the same every time. In many circumstances, management concepts are not verifiable. In fact, in many circumstances, understanding the foundations on which management ideas have been developed is challenging.
Science’s principles have universal application, which means they are true regardless of the circumstances in which they are used. Management concepts, on the other hand, are situational. It suggests that a management principle that is effective in one country may not be effective in another. This is because the two countries’ situations are so dissimilar.
There are mainly three levels of management viz;
It is made up of a director’s inboard, a CEO, and a managing director. It is the prime source of authority and is in charge of an organization’s goals and policies. It spends more time on functions such as planning and coordination.
The top management’s role can be summarised as follows:
Middle management consists of branch and departmental managers. Their department’s operation is their responsibility to upper management. It is possible to emphasise their role as follows:
The supervisory/operational level of management is also known as the lower level of management. Supervisors, foremen, section officers, superintendents, and others make up this group. “Lower level of management refers to those executives whose work is primarily concerned with personal oversight and direction of operative employees. Among their activities are:
To be a successful manager, a person must have a thorough understanding of management principles as well as the ability to apply that knowledge. Inefficiency will result if either is missing.