Consider the following statements:
Statement I:
The S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) case made the imposition of President’s Rule subject to judicial review.
Statement II:
The Court held that the satisfaction of the President is completely beyond judicial scrutiny.
Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?
Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II is the correct explanation for Statement I.
Statement I is not correct but Statement II is correct.
Both Statement I and Statement II are correct but Statement II is not the correct explanation for Statement I.
Statement I is correct but Statement II is not correct.
Boost your performance with adaptive practice tests
Practice every concept in the syllabus
Compare your speed and accuracy with your peers
Download the app and practice on the go