Home
SELF STUDY
BrowsePracticeTestsPlaylistDoubts & solutionsOther coursesPrime

State Legislature

Quick practice

Question 1 of 5

Consider the following statements:

Statement I: 

The S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) case made the imposition of President’s Rule subject to judicial review.

Statement II: 

The Court held that the satisfaction of the President is completely beyond judicial scrutiny.

 

Which one of the following is correct in respect of the above statements?

A

Both Statement I and Statement II are correct but Statement II is not the correct explanation for Statement I.

B

Both Statement I and Statement II are correct and Statement II is the correct explanation for Statement I.

C

Statement I is correct but Statement II is not correct.

D

Statement I is not correct but Statement II is correct.

Get unlimited practice with UPSC CSE - GS subscription

pick

Boost your performance with adaptive practice tests

pick

Practice every concept in the syllabus

pick

Compare your speed and accuracy with your peers

pick

Download the app and practice on the go